On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:09:32AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 22/12/16(Thu) 20:45, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > I think this is what is required here. Works here, but YMMV.
> splnet() in a pseudo-driver seems completely wrong, you could get rid of
Yes, but that is another issue.
> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 22:59:18 +0100 (CET)
> From: Mark Kettenis
> > Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 08:29:05 +0100
> > From: Martin Pieuchot
> > On 28/12/16(Wed) 01:05, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> > > Mark Kettenis
> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 08:29:05 +0100
> From: Martin Pieuchot
> On 28/12/16(Wed) 01:05, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> > Mark Kettenis writes:
> > >> Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 00:08:35 +0100 (CET)
> > >> From: Mark Kettenis
On 2016 Dec 23 (Fri) at 16:57:27 +0100 (+0100), Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
:On 21.12.2016. 23:15, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
:>> it seems that bfd is working with Force10 S4810 and Extreme Networks
:>> x460 switches. I can test it with cisco c6k5 if you want?
:> i'm sure
In pf_refragment6() use the valid route from pf_route6() instead
of calling rtalloc() again.
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/pf.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1008
diff -u -p -r1.1008 pf.c
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 04:21:09PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Christiano Haesbaert has sent me this diff.
> They are setting pkt_sk to NULL if pkt_sk->reverse is not
> pf_statek_key_isvalid(), but the chunk that creates the pkt_sk->reverse
passwd(1) does not clear memory used for the the second password
input. Use explicit_bzero(3) to zero the memory when we're done with
it. Utilities like bioctl(8) and signify(1) already do this.
>> Am 28.12.2016 um 08:29 schrieb Martin Pieuchot :
>> On 28/12/16(Wed) 01:05, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> Mark Kettenis writes:
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 00:08:35 +0100 (CET)
From: Mark Kettenis