Hi,
The ability to jump to a tag in less is such a powerful feature that
deserves a better interface. Especially in combination with mandoc which
emits tags. Here's a diff that adds tab completion for tags, similar to
the existing completion for file names.
Some notes about the diff:
- As I read
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 12:06:01PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the attached diff adds support for rdomains in vmd.
>
> In vm.conf, add an interface to a specified rdomain. local interfaces
> work as expected, but the host-side routing and PF has to be done in
> the non-default rdomain a
> Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 21:05:24 +0100
> From: Stuart Henderson
>
> On 2017/05/03 15:12, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 13:51:22 +0100
> > > From: Stuart Henderson
> > >
> > > On 2017/05/01 22:18, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > > Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 20:58:29 +0100
> > > > > Fr
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Bob Beck wrote:
> So. There *Is* an official OpenBSD 6.1 CD
>
> Just One.
>
> If you are interested, please bid on ebay :
>
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/The-only-Official-OpenBSD-6-1-CD-
> set-to-be-made-For-auction-for-the-project-/252910718452?
> hash=item3ae2a74d
So. There *Is* an official OpenBSD 6.1 CD
Just One.
If you are interested, please bid on ebay :
http://www.ebay.com/itm/The-only-Official-OpenBSD-6-1-CD-set-to-be-made-For-auction-for-the-project-/252910718452?hash=item3ae2a74df4:g:SJQAAOSwrhBZBqkd
(It's a pretty cool little CD set!)
On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 10:26:02PM -0400, T.J. Townsend wrote:
> Errata patches for dhcpd, vmm, LibreSSL and softraid have been released
> for OpenBSD 6.1 today.
>
> Details can be found on this page: https://www.openbsd.org/errata61.html
>
> Binary updates for the amd64 and i386 platforms are al
On 2017/05/03 15:12, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 13:51:22 +0100
> > From: Stuart Henderson
> >
> > On 2017/05/01 22:18, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 20:58:29 +0100
> > > > From: Stuart Henderson
> > > >
> > > > Userland is non-responsive, machine is ping
On 2017/05/03 10:33, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I've got an amd64 web app server running 6.0/tomcat 7.0/jdk 1.8.
> Occasionally I get a lot of FDs building up, looking like this in
> fstat:
>
> $ fstat | grep internet.stream.tcp | head -1500 |tail -5
> _tomcat java 88950 1585* internet str
> Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 13:51:22 +0100
> From: Stuart Henderson
>
> On 2017/05/01 22:18, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 20:58:29 +0100
> > > From: Stuart Henderson
> > >
> > > Userland is non-responsive, machine is pingable, tcp connections open
> > > but no banner from ssh. N
On 2017/05/01 22:18, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 20:58:29 +0100
> > From: Stuart Henderson
> >
> > Userland is non-responsive, machine is pingable, tcp connections open
> > but no banner from ssh. No failed pool requests. This kernel is from
> > today's snapshot but I saw the s
On Wed, 03 May 2017 08:03:06 +0200, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 01:36:51PM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> >
> > looks good, ok nicm
>
> Anyone willing to commit?
Committed.
- todd
Hello tech@,
On receiving a packet with unsupported versions rdate(8) says
that "Received NTP version %u, need 4 or lower". This is not quite
true. Supported versions are 1, 2, 3, 4 and not 0.
Index: ntp.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.
Hi,
the attached diff adds support for rdomains in vmd.
In vm.conf, add an interface to a specified rdomain. local interfaces
work as expected, but the host-side routing and PF has to be done in
the non-default rdomain as well.
vm "foo" {
local interface rdomain 1
interface {
I've got an amd64 web app server running 6.0/tomcat 7.0/jdk 1.8.
Occasionally I get a lot of FDs building up, looking like this in
fstat:
$ fstat | grep internet.stream.tcp | head -1500 |tail -5
_tomcat java 88950 1585* internet stream tcp 0x0 *:0
_tomcat java 88950 1586* internet
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 10:12:04AM +0200, Gerhard Roth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> all MBIM values are in litte-endian encoding but somewhere in the fine
> print it reads that "the addresses will be in network byte order".
>
> So applying letoh32() on addresses is just plain wrong. On little-endian
> machin
Hi,
all MBIM values are in litte-endian encoding but somewhere in the fine
print it reads that "the addresses will be in network byte order".
So applying letoh32() on addresses is just plain wrong. On little-endian
machines, we didn't notice since letoh32() is a no-op there. But one
big-endian on
16 matches
Mail list logo