On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 01:23:35AM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at /sys/sys/timetc.h:
> 46 struct timecounter {
> 47 timecounter_get_t *tc_get_timecount;
> 48 /*
> 49 * This function reads the counter. It is not required to
>
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:48:36AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> vmd currently performs disk io for the guest synchronously in the
> same thread the guest is running in. it also uses bounce buffers
> in between the guests "physical" memory and the read and writes
> against the disk image.
>
> this
vmd currently performs disk io for the guest synchronously in the
same thread the guest is running in. it also uses bounce buffers
in between the guests "physical" memory and the read and writes
against the disk image.
this diff moves the vioblk ring processing into a taskq, ie, another
thread. th
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 08:52:49AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > The mentioning of the S option in malloc.conf(5) won't actually tell the
> > user what flags it enables. Rephrased this and list the options.
>
> In our original discussion, that was done intentionally. The flags
> in use can ch
> The mentioning of the S option in malloc.conf(5) won't actually tell the
> user what flags it enables. Rephrased this and list the options.
In our original discussion, that was done intentionally. The flags
in use can change, and even some other behaviours change subtly.
There are times where
Hi all,
The mentioning of the S option in malloc.conf(5) won't actually tell the
user what flags it enables. Rephrased this and list the options.
Jesper Wallin
Index: ./share/man/man5/malloc.conf.5
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/ma
