Hello,
just in case there is yet another brave soul running the diff below:
Hrvoje has managed to trip the ASSERT() in ip_send() function at
line 1843. I assume the ip6_send() is prone to same error.
I'll try to figure out what's going on and send updated diff shortly.
Big thanks to Hrv
Hi,
in 2015 remote(5) was trimmed down when tip was removed. It looks like
documentation for capability "dc" was also removed by accident. cu(1) still
supports this (src/usr.bin/cu/cu.c):
381 if (is_direct == -1 && cgetcap(cp, "dc", ':') != NULL)
382 is_direct = 1;
Below
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:16:47PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
>
> > On 27.10.2017, at 19:10, Mike Larkin wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 09:58:09AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> >> On 26/10/17(Thu) 23:47, Mike Larkin wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 08:23:05AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot
> On 27.10.2017, at 19:10, Mike Larkin wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 09:58:09AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> On 26/10/17(Thu) 23:47, Mike Larkin wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 08:23:05AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 26/10/17(Thu) 16:23, Carlos Cardenas wrote:
> * Requir
Hello,
thank you for looking at my changes. updated patch is below. The list
of changes is as follows:
o SOFTNET_TASKS 1 is defined to 1
o call to task_add():
@@ -1839,5 +1839,5 @@ void
ip_send(struct mbuf *m)
{
mq_enqueue(&ipsend_mq, m);
- task_add(soft
Hi,
Honor RFC 5903 in isakmpd(8) as well. The member g_xy is always the
shared secret, but so far it has always been using the length of public
points. Since this is different now, as the shared secret for EC Groups
should only store the x point, we need another member to specify the
length of g
On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 10:07:39 +0200
Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 17/10/17(Tue) 14:26, Helg Bredow wrote:
> > [...]
> > I've split the patch. This one improves argument and option parsing so that
> > almost all sshfs arguments and options will now parse. It won't recognise
> > -ocache=no since fu
On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 09:24:55 +0200
Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 25/10/17(Wed) 13:27, Helg Bredow wrote:
> > I've included different minor patches below as one patch. I haven't split
> > into separate patches since the changes are not complex and easy to audit.
> >
> > Here's what it does:
> >
These tests confirm that currently supported options are parsed correctly by
libfuse. They assume that the patches I've submitted previously have been
applied.
Review and suggestions for improvement are welcome.
Patch to Makefile is below and new tests are attached.
Index: Makefile
==
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:35:03 +0800
"Michael W. Bombardieri" wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 05:27:29PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to add a platform-id for EFI boot.
>>
>> ok?
>>
>> diff --git a/usr.sbin/makefs/cd9660/cd9660_eltorito.c
>> b/usr.sbin/makefs/cd9660/cd96
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 05:27:29PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to add a platform-id for EFI boot.
>
> ok?
>
> diff --git a/usr.sbin/makefs/cd9660/cd9660_eltorito.c
> b/usr.sbin/makefs/cd9660/cd9660_eltorito.c
> index 46ec432bc84..376c42f5dc3 100644
> --- a/usr.sbin/makefs/
On 30/10/17(Mon) 10:32, Peter Hessler wrote:
> :diff --git a/sys/netinet/ip_input.c b/sys/netinet/ip_input.c
> :index 95c9194efcb..33cc3161bcb 100644
> :--- a/sys/netinet/ip_input.c
> :+++ b/sys/netinet/ip_input.c
> :@@ -1839,5 +1839,5 @@ void
> : ip_send(struct mbuf *m)
> : {
> : mq_enqueue(&i
On 2017 Oct 30 (Mon) at 08:36:34 +0100 (+0100), Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
:Hello,
:
:patch below adds additional softnet taskq. This will allow certain degree of
:parallelism for packet processing in pf_test(). The current plan is to let
:packets received by even NICs (even ifindex) to be processe
On 30/10/17(Mon) 08:36, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> patch below adds additional softnet taskq. This will allow certain degree of
> parallelism for packet processing in pf_test(). The current plan is to let
> packets received by even NICs (even ifindex) to be processed by task0, packets
Let me update the diff and subject.
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 17:27:29 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> diff --git a/usr.sbin/makefs/cd9660/cd9660_eltorito.h
> b/usr.sbin/makefs/cd9660/cd9660_eltorito.h
> index 43483018ef3..f527bc56b46 100644
> --- a/usr.sbin/makefs/cd9660/cd9660_eltorito.h
> +++
Hi,
I'd like to add a platform-id for EFI boot.
ok?
diff --git a/usr.sbin/makefs/cd9660/cd9660_eltorito.c
b/usr.sbin/makefs/cd9660/cd9660_eltorito.c
index 46ec432bc84..376c42f5dc3 100644
--- a/usr.sbin/makefs/cd9660/cd9660_eltorito.c
+++ b/usr.sbin/makefs/cd9660/cd9660_eltorito.c
@@ -104,6 +104
Hi,
> I'd like to fix two bugs which cause problems of the order of the boot
> entries. A diff which add EFI support will follow them.
next one
ok?
Fix a bug make the boot entries' order reverse, introduced at 1.8 on NetBSD.
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/usr.sbin/makefs/cd9660/c
Hi,
I'd like to fix two bugs which cause problems of the order of the boot
entries. A diff which add EFI support will follow them.
ok?
Initialize boot_catalog_entry's entry_type properly. This had been
missing but the type was used in cd9660_setup_boot().
diff --git a/usr.sbin/makefs/cd9660/
Hello,
patch below adds additional softnet taskq. This will allow certain degree of
parallelism for packet processing in pf_test(). The current plan is to let
packets received by even NICs (even ifindex) to be processed by task0, packets
received by odd NICs (odd ifindex) by task1.
big thanks sho
Hello,
> > patch below move responsibility for PF_LOCK manipulation to particular ioctl
> > commands. The change is investment for future. It will allow us to gradually
> > move individual PF subsystems out of PF_LOCK scope.
>
> I'm always afraid when an ioctl(2) logic contains multiple return o
20 matches
Mail list logo