On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 10:51:24PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I noticed relatively high cpu use from slaacd on a BGP router
> that was undergoing some route churn earlier (no interfaces were
> actually configured to use slaac).
>
> routesock is currently unfiltered so will see a lot of messa
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 1:20 AM Paul Irofti wrote:
> POSIX mandates that we return EINVAL if count equals zero on barrier
> initialization. Which makes sense to me.
>
> This also fixes posixtestsuite conformance 3-1 test.
>
> OK?
>
ok guenther@
I noticed relatively high cpu use from slaacd on a BGP router
that was undergoing some route churn earlier (no interfaces were
actually configured to use slaac).
routesock is currently unfiltered so will see a lot of messages,
frontend_routesock is filtered but will still see all RTM_DELETE
which
On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 09:28:34AM -0400, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > On Jul 5, 2018, at 6:51 AM, Paul Irofti wrote:
> >
> > [...]
>
> From [1]:
>
> > The value of CLOCKS_PER_SEC shall be 1 million on XSI-conformant systems.
> > However, it may be variable on other systems, and it should not be as
> On Jul 5, 2018, at 6:51 AM, Paul Irofti wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> POSIX requires that CLOCKS_PER_SEC be 1,000,000[0,1].
>
> Any reason we have it set to 100?
>
> Paul
>
> [0] -- http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/clock.html
> [1] -- http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695
> Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 13:19:20 +0300
> From: Paul Irofti
>
> Hi,
>
> POSIX mandates that we return EINVAL if count equals zero on barrier
> initialization. Which makes sense to me.
>
> This also fixes posixtestsuite conformance 3-1 test.
>
> OK?
>
>
> Index: rthread_barrier.c
> ===
Next step on the bigger RIB refactor. Introduce a filterstate instead of
passing multiple things around. As a benefit this reduces the amount of
malloc() / free() calls because the rde_aspath is now on the stack.
After that more changes will become possible like moving nexthop into the
state, etc.
> From: Aaron Lancaster
> Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 11:40:38 -0600
>
> I wrote this patch/script to deal with a very irritating case of
> circular dependency failure I recently encountered on an APU2 system.
>
> On systems with non-existent or dead battery real time clocks, with DNS
> over TLS being
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 11:51:46PM +0200, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Remi noticed that ospfd does no longer see new interfaces.
>
> The priority filter should only work on routing messages that
> have a rtm_priority.
>
> So these are out:
>
> RTM_DELADDR
> RTM_NEWADDR (struct ifa_msghdr)
> RTM_IF
Hi,
POSIX requires that CLOCKS_PER_SEC be 1,000,000[0,1].
Any reason we have it set to 100?
Paul
[0] -- http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/clock.html
[1] -- http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/time.h.html
Hi,
POSIX mandates that we return EINVAL if count equals zero on barrier
initialization. Which makes sense to me.
This also fixes posixtestsuite conformance 3-1 test.
OK?
Index: rthread_barrier.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/librthr
Diff below unlocks 12 network syscalls. It relies on the recent work
that has been to make 'struct file' refcounting mpsafe and on the
corresponding socket lock before messing with the content of any
socket.
Why can we unlock the following syscall? Here's an explanation.
- sys_recvmsg() and sys
On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 11:04:34AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 05/07/18(Thu) 09:28, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 01:50:24PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 09:05:56AM +0200, Remco wrote:
> > > > > > If you don't find any better solution, I'd sugg
On 05/07/18(Thu) 09:28, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 01:50:24PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 09:05:56AM +0200, Remco wrote:
> > > > > If you don't find any better solution, I'd suggest using a device ID
> > > > > check rather than adding a quirk. Becaus
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 01:50:24PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 09:05:56AM +0200, Remco wrote:
> > > > If you don't find any better solution, I'd suggest using a device ID
> > > > check rather than adding a quirk. Because such quirk cannot be generic.
> > > > In that case
15 matches
Mail list logo