On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, jungle boogie wrote:
> I see the release notes are alive:
> https://www.openssh.com/txt/release-7.9
>
> Might want to change the link on https://www.openssh.com leading to the
> release, still showing 7.8.
not everything updates at once, some things need to be committed befo
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 04:57:23PM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On 10/18/18 16:51, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > When reviewing otto@'s diff I found the following, which was also part
> > of the r1.4 import. I managed to contact michaels and he told me that he
> > couldn't recollect anything
Thus said Darren Tucker on Fri, 19 Oct 2018 14:23:48 +1100
On 18 October 2018 at 07:20, Markus Lude wrote:
Hello,
www/64.html mentions OpenSSH version 7.8.
With snapshot from october 11th on amd64 the version of ssh is 7.9:
it's 7.9, which was officially released a couple of hours ago. T
On 18 October 2018 at 07:20, Markus Lude wrote:
> Hello,
>
> www/64.html mentions OpenSSH version 7.8.
>
> With snapshot from october 11th on amd64 the version of ssh is 7.9:
>
it's 7.9, which was officially released a couple of hours ago. The website
will be updated shortly.
$ ssh -V
> OpenSS
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:00 PM wrote:
> getsockopt(2) and setsockopt(2) take a void pointer for the third
> parameter so there is no need for any of these casts.
>
Yep.
> I can do other style(9)-type cleanup in a subsequent diff or I can
> cook this diff and do it all in one.
>
> Thoughts, p
Hi,
getsockopt(2) and setsockopt(2) take a void pointer for the third
parameter so there is no need for any of these casts.
I can do other style(9)-type cleanup in a subsequent diff or I can
cook this diff and do it all in one.
Thoughts, preferences?
Index: share/man/man4/multicast.4
==
> On 18 Oct 2018, at 15:55, Adrian Close wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> When using PF queues on a VLAN interface on 6.3/amd64, I'm seeing the VLAN
> priority field always set to 7 for outbound traffic. For example:
>
> queue rootq_100 on vlan100 bandwidth 1G
> queue ltd_100 parent rootq_100 band
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:09:59PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 11:03:58AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > on modern sparc64s (think fire or sparc enterprise Mx000 boxes),
> > setting up and tearing down the translation table entries (TTEs)
> > is very expensive. so expensive
On 2018/10/18 18:58, James Anderson wrote:
> Freshly upgraded to 6.4, rebooted and went to update syspatches, firmware,
> packages. Running syspatch I expected a 404 error
> (https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=153987805403874&w=2), but instead
> was greeted with "signify: invalid comment". Thought
Freshly upgraded to 6.4, rebooted and went to update syspatches, firmware,
packages. Running syspatch I expected a 404 error
(https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=153987805403874&w=2), but instead
was greeted with "signify: invalid comment". Thought this was a local
issue but there are no /tmp/syspa
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 07:12:32PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> The hand-rolled list queue(3) is replacing here is singly linked
> but used an extra pointer in rti_delete() to get O(n) deletion.
> I kept the O(n) deletion by using LIST. If the extra space needed
> for LIST is unacceptable I can u
That helps. Thanx!
Mischa
> On 18 Oct 2018, at 17:47, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> That error message is because there are no syspatch yet, it is not from the
> firmware update.
>
>
> On 18 October 2018 16:02:34 Mischa wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>> Just ran a couple of updates and clean i
That error message is because there are no syspatch yet, it is not from the
firmware update.
On 18 October 2018 16:02:34 Mischa wrote:
Hi All,
Just ran a couple of updates and clean installs and I am seeing the
following error during boot.
Clean install:
running rc.firsttime
Path to fi
Hello -
This diff splits the ctloutput functions into getopt/setopt, which could
offer more fine-grained locking. It also removes some indentation and
imo is easier to read.
Thoughts?
Index: net/rtsock.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/
Hi All,
Just ran a couple of updates and clean installs and I am seeing the following
error during boot.
Clean install:
running rc.firsttime
Path to firmware: http://firmware.openbsd.org/firmware/6.4/
Installing: intel-firmware
Checking for available binary patches...ftp: Err
On 10/18/18 16:51, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> When reviewing otto@'s diff I found the following, which was also part
> of the r1.4 import. I managed to contact michaels and he told me that he
> couldn't recollect anything other then what was in the commit message
> and other local changes were mo
When reviewing otto@'s diff I found the following, which was also part
of the r1.4 import. I managed to contact michaels and he told me that he
couldn't recollect anything other then what was in the commit message
and other local changes were most likely not intentional.
I tested this behaviour
- OpenBSD 6.4 RELEASED -
October 18, 2018.
We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 6.4.
This is our 45th release. We remain proud of OpenBSD's record of m
hi all,
while playing around with carp, pfsync, pflow and doing ifconfig pfsync0
destroy && sh netstart in loop i noticed that carp demote counter
becomes really high
r710-2# ifconfig -g carp
carp: carp demote count 4321
don't know is this normal or not but problem is that i can't lower that
cou
Change the way ribs are porcessed. Currently all async dumpers have to
call rib_dump_r() whenever progress should be made. Also creating the
context for such a dump is all on the caller side. Change this to one
central place. Now all that is needed is to call rib_dump_new() with
the callbacks for u
Hi all,
When using PF queues on a VLAN interface on 6.3/amd64, I'm seeing the
VLAN priority field always set to 7 for outbound traffic. For example:
queue rootq_100 on vlan100 bandwidth 1G
queue ltd_100 parent rootq_100 bandwidth 20M max 50M
queue std_100 parent rootq_100 bandwidth 500M
21 matches
Mail list logo
