Re: ripd: fib-priority

2018-12-31 Thread Remi Locherer
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 01:33:39PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Sun, Dec 30 2018, Remi Locherer wrote: > > Hi tech, > > > > after adding the config option "fib-priority" to ospfd/ospf6d I figured out > > that it is almost the same change to add it to ripd. > > > > After that all our

remove unused header from sys/dev/usb/umidi

2018-12-31 Thread Alexandre Ratchov
Found by jcs@. ok? Index: umidi.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/usb/umidi.c,v retrieving revision 1.51 diff -u -p -r1.51 umidi.c --- umidi.c 16 Nov 2018 11:55:56 - 1.51 +++ umidi.c 31 Dec 2018 20:08:57 - @@ -44,

Re: ripd: fib-priority

2018-12-31 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Sun, Dec 30 2018, Remi Locherer wrote: > Hi tech, > > after adding the config option "fib-priority" to ospfd/ospf6d I figured out > that it is almost the same change to add it to ripd. > > After that all our routing daemons (unicast) have an option to adjust > the fib-priority. Or did I miss on

Re: pfctl.8: mention that -T{add,replace} creates persistent tables

2018-12-31 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 07:05:06AM +, Jason McIntyre wrote: > i'm not a huge fan of how it reads now anyway. but your proposal makes > sense. so, without wanting to pick the text apart right now, i say just > go for it. The change is kept small deliberately, as I did not want to rewrite this se