Hello tech@,
Given this is my first email to the list, and the first patch I have
submitted to the OpenBSD project, I am very open to feedback on
the attached patch and context provided!
Below I have included a patch I have been working on to modify some of
the logic when handling E-series Huawei
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 10:40:35PM -0600, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> > You started to convert the wrong timeout_add() calls. Doing a blind
> > timeout_add() to timeout_add_msec() conversion especially on calls with 0
> > or 1 tick sleep time is the wrong approach.
> > The right approach is to identify
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 01:13:23PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> i was trying to figure out which bit of ldpd had the pfkey socket (cos
> reading code is hard sometimes), but had to work a little bit too hard
> to figure it out from what fstat currently prints. this has fstat printf
> "pfkey" when i
i was trying to figure out which bit of ldpd had the pfkey socket (cos
reading code is hard sometimes), but had to work a little bit too hard
to figure it out from what fstat currently prints. this has fstat printf
"pfkey" when it hits an AF_KEY socket, rather than hit the default
handler which pri
Adapt to allwinner device tree changes in linux >= 5.0-rc1
"allwinner,sun6i-a31-rtc" has been removed from h3/h5/r40/a64
507c6e89d6c4b2cd68a8e7ff69d1a00cf74b15dd
ARM: dts: sunxi: h3/h5: Fix up RTC device node and clock references
44ff3cafcd7f413e7710a58ac40cfdc3a9380097
arm64: dts: allwinner: a64
Last usage got removed in
revision 1.9
date: 2001/02/08 08:35:17; author: itojun; state: Exp; lines: +109
-27;
pull latest kame tree. ndp -n -a printing is now prettier with long
IPv6 addresses. -l is deprecated (ignored).
OK?
Index: ndp.c
==
Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2019.01.18 00:11:27 +0100:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 03:21:58PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > - if (la_hold_total < LA_HOLD_TOTAL && la_hold_total < nmbclust / 64)
> > {
> > + if (la_hold_total < nmbclust / 64) {
> >
> > I have disagreed wi
Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2019.01.20 12:33:29 +0100:
> In many cases it is nice to be able to use a command against a group of
> neighbors (e.g. all exchange peers). This diff implements this for
> bgpctl neighbor group foo [clear|destroy|down|refresh|up]
> bgpctl show
On 1/20/19 3:11 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Fabio,
>
> Fabio Scotoni wrote on Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 12:52:18PM +0100:
>
>> The what(1) man page has a BUGS section,
>> which mdoc(7) says is discouraged in OpenBSD.
>
> What? Using BUGS sections is perfectly fine.
>
> The mdoc(7) manual page doe
Hi Ingo,
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 03:11:55PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
| > Talking about BSD not being able to distribute SCCS doesn't help
| > anyone;
| > not behaving like the original SCCS is obvious considering the
| > STANDARDS section specifically notes OpenBSD extensions and
| > compliance
Hi Fabio,
Fabio Scotoni wrote on Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 12:52:18PM +0100:
> The what(1) man page has a BUGS section,
> which mdoc(7) says is discouraged in OpenBSD.
What? Using BUGS sections is perfectly fine.
The mdoc(7) manual page does not intend to say that using BUGS
sections is discouraged
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 12:56:22PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2019/01/18 10:59, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> > I have "covered" up PPPoE Session ID's from users because it is a value that
> > is only gotten on the Data Link layer and historically non-root users did
> > not
> > have access to
The what(1) man page has a BUGS section,
which mdoc(7) says is discouraged in OpenBSD.
The contents of the BUGS section is mostly unhelpful anyway.
Talking about BSD not being able to distribute SCCS doesn't help
anyone;
not behaving like the original SCCS is obvious considering the
STANDARDS sect
On 2019/01/18 10:59, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> I have "covered" up PPPoE Session ID's from users because it is a value that
> is only gotten on the Data Link layer and historically non-root users did not
> have access to that. It really is a value that doesn't concern them. I have
> wrapped the d
On 2019/01/20 12:33, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> In many cases it is nice to be able to use a command against a group of
> neighbors (e.g. all exchange peers). This diff implements this for
> bgpctl neighbor group foo [clear|destroy|down|refresh|up]
> bgpctl show neighbor group foo [messages
In many cases it is nice to be able to use a command against a group of
neighbors (e.g. all exchange peers). This diff implements this for
bgpctl neighbor group foo [clear|destroy|down|refresh|up]
bgpctl show neighbor group foo [messages|terse|timers]
bgpctl show rib neighbo
16 matches
Mail list logo
