On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 01:57:46AM +, Ian McWilliam wrote:
>
>
> On 28/4/19, 12:56 am, "owner-t...@openbsd.org on behalf of Otto Moerbeek"
> wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 04:43:14PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 04:37:23PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On 28/4/19, 12:56 am, "owner-t...@openbsd.org on behalf of Otto Moerbeek"
wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 04:43:14PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 04:37:23PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 09:55:33PM +0800, Nathanael Rensen wrote:
>>
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 09:53:08PM +0200, Mischa Peters wrote:
> Let me know if this needs more work. Love the idea of sysupgrade!
Please shelf this for now, there is a lot of churn going on in the
tool in private and we are moving very fast.
There are more subtleties to consider.
--
I'm not en
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 02:16:26PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Florian Obser wrote:
>
> > It has the date and time with seconds resolution in there. Not just the
> > built number.
>
> Yes from KARL on one machine, and snapshot/release builds on a different
> machine.
>
> Could this not false
Florian Obser wrote:
> It has the date and time with seconds resolution in there. Not just the built
> number.
Yes from KARL on one machine, and snapshot/release builds on a different
machine.
Could this not false-positive?
> On April 27, 2019 9:57:59 PM GMT+02:00, Theo de Raadt
> wrote:
>
It has the date and time with seconds resolution in there. Not just the built
number.
On April 27, 2019 9:57:59 PM GMT+02:00, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
>> As Florian suggested I compared kern.version to what from both bsd
>and bsd.mp.
>
>Do not do that.
>
>kern.version in snapshots and releases are
> As Florian suggested I compared kern.version to what from both bsd and bsd.mp.
Do not do that.
kern.version in snapshots and releases are completely arbitrary, based on
whether I delete an obj tree, then the version numbers begin anew. This
heuristic will false-positive.
On 27 Apr at 17:52, Florian Obser wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 01:23:20PM +0100, Marco Bonetti wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > First of all congratulations on a new OpenBSD release and thanks for
> > introducing sysupgrade in -current.
> >
> > Before sysupgrade, I was using a custom script f
On 2019-04-27, Marco Bonetti wrote:
> +unpriv -f SHA256.sig.tmp ftp -Vmo SHA256.sig.tmp ${URL}SHA256.sig
> +TMP_SHA=$(sha256 -q SHA256.sig.tmp)
> +
> +unpriv touch SHA256.sig
This fails if SHA256.sig doesn't exist yet. The unprivileged user
cannot create files in $SETSDIR.
> +unpriv cat SHA256
Well, the manual shall tell the truth, whatever it is:
Messages are formed by a header followed by a small number of
sockaddr structures of variable length. The size of every
sockaddr structure can be computed by rounding the value of the
`sa_len' field of the current structure up
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 01:23:20PM +0100, Marco Bonetti wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> First of all congratulations on a new OpenBSD release and thanks for
> introducing sysupgrade in -current.
>
> Before sysupgrade, I was using a custom script for achieving the same
> result with only difference that
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 04:43:14PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 04:37:23PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 09:55:33PM +0800, Nathanael Rensen wrote:
> > > The diff below speeds up ld.so library intialisation where the dependency
> > > tree is
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 04:37:23PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 09:55:33PM +0800, Nathanael Rensen wrote:
> > The diff below speeds up ld.so library intialisation where the dependency
> > tree is broad and deep, such as samba's smbd which links over 100 libraries.
> >
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 09:55:33PM +0800, Nathanael Rensen wrote:
> The diff below speeds up ld.so library intialisation where the dependency
> tree is broad and deep, such as samba's smbd which links over 100 libraries.
>
> See for example https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=155007285712913&w=2
>
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 01:23:20PM +0100, Marco Bonetti wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> First of all congratulations on a new OpenBSD release and thanks for
> introducing sysupgrade in -current.
>
> Before sysupgrade, I was using a custom script for achieving the same
> result with only difference that
The diff below speeds up ld.so library intialisation where the dependency
tree is broad and deep, such as samba's smbd which links over 100 libraries.
See for example https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=155007285712913&w=2
See https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=155637285221396&w=2 for part 1
tha
The diff below speeds up ld.so library loading where the dependency tree
is broad and deep, such as samba's smbd which links over 100 libraries.
See for example https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=155007285712913&w=2
The timings below are for ldd /usr/local/sbin/smbd:
Timing without diff: 2m02.
Hello folks,
First of all congratulations on a new OpenBSD release and thanks for
introducing sysupgrade in -current.
Before sysupgrade, I was using a custom script for achieving the same
result with only difference that I was checking if a new snapshot (or
release) is available by looking at BUI
18 matches
Mail list logo