Hi David
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:53:27AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> it's always bothered me that i config areas on a crisco using a number,
> but then have to think hard to convert that number to an address for use
> in openbsd. eg, i was given area 700 in one place, which is 0.0.2.188
> as a
it's always bothered me that i config areas on a crisco using a number,
but then have to think hard to convert that number to an address for use
in openbsd. eg, i was given area 700 in one place, which is 0.0.2.188
as an address. super annoying.
so this changes the ospfd parser so it accepts both
On 04/27, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> On 2019-04-27, Marco Bonetti wrote:
>
> > +unpriv -f SHA256.sig.tmp ftp -Vmo SHA256.sig.tmp ${URL}SHA256.sig
> > +TMP_SHA=$(sha256 -q SHA256.sig.tmp)
> > +
> > +unpriv touch SHA256.sig
>
> This fails if SHA256.sig doesn't exist yet. The unprivileged user
On 04/27, Andreas Kusalananda K?h?ri wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 01:23:20PM +0100, Marco Bonetti wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > First of all congratulations on a new OpenBSD release and thanks for
> > introducing sysupgrade in -current.
> >
> > Before sysupgrade, I was using a custom script
On 04/27, Florian Obser wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 01:23:20PM +0100, Marco Bonetti wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > First of all congratulations on a new OpenBSD release and thanks for
> > introducing sysupgrade in -current.
> >
> > Before sysupgrade, I was using a custom script for achievin
Remi Locherer(remi.loche...@relo.ch) on 2019.04.28 11:43:41 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> the parser in ospf(6)d accepts depend on interfaces that are in a
> different rdomain. This works on startup of the daemon. But since it
> filters route messages based on it's rdomain it will not get notified
> if the dep
On 4/28/19 6:01 AM, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 08:55:16AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 09:55:33PM +0800, Nathanael Rensen wrote:
The diff below speeds up ld.so library intialisation where the
dependency
tree is broad and deep, such as samba's sm
On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 13:04:22 +0200
Robert Nagy wrote:
> On 28/04/19 12:01 +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 08:55:16AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > >> > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 09:55:33PM +0800, Nathanael Rensen
> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > >> > > The diff below sp
On 28/04/19 12:01 +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 08:55:16AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > >> > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 09:55:33PM +0800, Nathanael Rensen wrote:
> > > >> > > The diff below speeds up ld.so library intialisation where the
> > > >>dependency
> > > >> > >
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 08:55:16AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > >> > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 09:55:33PM +0800, Nathanael Rensen wrote:
> > >> > > The diff below speeds up ld.so library intialisation where the
> > >>dependency
> > >> > > tree is broad and deep, such as samba's smbd which links
Hi,
the parser in ospf(6)d accepts depend on interfaces that are in a
different rdomain. This works on startup of the daemon. But since it
filters route messages based on it's rdomain it will not get notified
if the depend on interface changes link state.
Below diff extends the existing conf_chec
> >> > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 09:55:33PM +0800, Nathanael Rensen wrote:
> >> > > The diff below speeds up ld.so library intialisation where the
> >>dependency
> >> > > tree is broad and deep, such as samba's smbd which links over 100
> >>libraries.
Past experience with ld.so changes suggests it w
On 27 Apr at 22:57, Florian Obser wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 09:53:08PM +0200, Mischa Peters wrote:
> > Let me know if this needs more work. Love the idea of sysupgrade!
>
> Please shelf this for now, there is a lot of churn going on in the
> tool in private and we are moving very fast.
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
