Clear unused redist_list the same way as in ospfd.
OK?
Remi
Index: ospf6d.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d/ospf6d.h,v
retrieving revision 1.39
diff -u -p -r1.39 ospf6d.h
--- ospf6d.h29 Dec 2018 16:04:31 - 1.39
When userland was massaged for pledge(), I hesitated using the
"manually call tzset()" approach for handling things. It felt
too low-level to call tzset(), an API almost noone knows the
existance of.
Arriving in the same situation to satisfy unveil(). Again calling
tzset() feels too unfamiliar a
Hi Fabio,
Fabio Scotoni wrote on Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 12:15:57PM +0200:
> This patch fixes a newline in proot.1 preventing LOCKDIR from
> being rendered correctly.
Thanks for reporting. I committed the patch shown below.
> Note that this causes the input line to be very long, which
> seemed ok
Hi!
Personally I don't like this mode, I think it will be much better just
to add condition to {beginning,end}-of-buffer to push mark only if it's
not pushed already.
The only thing I didn't implement is region highlighting because I am
still not familiar with mg's code.
Here's the diff:
Index:
This patch fixes a newline in proot.1 preventing LOCKDIR from
being rendered correctly.
Note that this causes the input line to be very long, which
seemed okay to me because dhcp-options.5 does the same (e.g. on
line 184).
Index: share/man/man1/proot.1
On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 01:42:04PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> shrug, I was just passive aggressively reacting to some unhelpful
> asshattery.
To clarify: This was not aimed at mestre@.
New unbound is in rc testing, here's a diff if anyone is interested.
"This release contains a number of bug fixes for crashes introduced in
1.9, session ticket code, stream pipeline code, auth zone code and it
also fixes qname minimisation packet scrub failures."
Index: doc/Changelog
===
On Sat, Jun 08 2019, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2019/06/08 13:15, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> Naive question: should sysctl(8) be pledged? I'm not objecting but
>> I wonder what we are trying to protect us from, here.
>
> AFAIK it can't be done because pledge always restricts which sysct
On 2019/06/08 13:15, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> Naive question: should sysctl(8) be pledged? I'm not objecting but
> I wonder what we are trying to protect us from, here.
AFAIK it can't be done because pledge always restricts which sysctl nodes
may be accessed.
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 01:50:51AM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've managed to get pf_test() running in parallel on forwarding path in my
> experimental tree. And there was some fall out. PF died on ASSERT() in
> pf_state_key_link_reverse() at line 7371:
>
> 7368 pf_state_k
On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 01:15:37PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 08 2019, Florian Obser wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 11:24:30PM +0100, Ricardo Mestre wrote:
> >> i did that and for some for reason i didn't get it! it tries to open
> >> timezone so it kinda looks like a
On Sat, Jun 08 2019, Florian Obser wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 11:24:30PM +0100, Ricardo Mestre wrote:
>> i did that and for some for reason i didn't get it! it tries to open
>> timezone so it kinda looks like a red flag right there...
>>
>> apart from /dev do we need to look into TZ on this
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 11:59:10AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 03:53:11PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 12:37:25AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > This diff changes the way communites are stored and modified in bgpd.
> > > The current implementa
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 11:24:30PM +0100, Ricardo Mestre wrote:
> i did that and for some for reason i didn't get it! it tries to open
> timezone so it kinda looks like a red flag right there...
>
> apart from /dev do we need to look into TZ on this one as well? if TZ
> var needs to be looked at t
14 matches
Mail list logo
