On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:50:05AM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The diff below adds support for RTL8153B to ure(4).
> Tested on Totolink u1003.
>
morning. the changes for ure.4 are fine, but can you adjust the entry in
usb.4 accordingly too, please?
thanks,
jmc
> Index:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 12:34:55PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:50:05AM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The diff below adds support for RTL8153B to ure(4).
> > Tested on Totolink u1003.
>
> I should mention that it's based on Linux r8152 driver.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:50:05AM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The diff below adds support for RTL8153B to ure(4).
> Tested on Totolink u1003.
I should mention that it's based on Linux r8152 driver.
Hi,
The diff below adds support for RTL8153B to ure(4).
Tested on Totolink u1003.
Index: share/man/man4/ure.4
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/ure.4,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.5 ure.4
---
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 11:01:26AM +0100, Ricardo Mestre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently vmd(8) has 3 processes that run under chroot(2)/chdir(2), namely
> control, vmm and priv. From these both control and vmm already run under
> different pledge(2)s but without any filesystem access, priv in the
On 8/26/19 11:42 AM, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 07:01:01AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
>> Right now all we get is "Misbehaving filter", which doesn't tell the
>> developer a lot.
>>
>> Diff below does the following:
>> - Make the register_hooks actually fail on
Hi,
Currently vmd(8) has 3 processes that run under chroot(2)/chdir(2), namely
control, vmm and priv. From these both control and vmm already run under
different pledge(2)s but without any filesystem access, priv in the other hand
cannot use pledge due to forbidden ioctls.
That being said the
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 07:01:01AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Right now all we get is "Misbehaving filter", which doesn't tell the
> developer a lot.
>
> Diff below does the following:
> - Make the register_hooks actually fail on misbehaviour.
> - Change some *ep = 0 to a more semantically
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, at 00:30, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
> 25 août 2019 07:01 "Martijn van Duren" a
> écrit:
> > Right now all we get is "Misbehaving filter", which doesn't tell the
> > developer a lot.
> >
>
> Indeed
>
>
> > Diff below does the following:
> > - Make the register_hooks
25 août 2019 07:01 "Martijn van Duren" a
écrit:
> Right now all we get is "Misbehaving filter", which doesn't tell the
> developer a lot.
>
Indeed
> Diff below does the following:
> - Make the register_hooks actually fail on misbehaviour.
> - Change some *ep = 0 to a more semantically
10 matches
Mail list logo
