Re: vmctl: print root user in status owner field

2019-12-15 Thread Mike Larkin
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 02:16:20AM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > With "owner root:wheel" (any group) the `vmctl status' output > will omit the "root" part in the OWNER column: > > vm "generic" { > owner "root:vms" > ... > } > > $ vmctl status >

Re: ublink(4), led(4) and ledctl(1)

2019-12-15 Thread Kevin Lo
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 10:34:59PM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a ThingM blink(1) USB RGB device that shows up as uhid(4). > The tooling is "interesting", especially with all those libusb and > HID libraries doing the abstraction. This introduces ublink(4), a > dedicated kernel

bktr(4): tsleep(9) -> tsleep_nsec(9)

2019-12-15 Thread Scott Cheloha
I don't have any of these cards, but these are straightforward conversions. ok? Index: bktr_audio.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/bktr/bktr_audio.c,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -p -r1.12 bktr_audio.c --- bktr_audio.c

Re: [PATCH] add support for more Nuvoton chips to lm(4)

2019-12-15 Thread Todd Mortimer
Hello, On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 06:32:36PM -0500, Joe Gidi wrote: > Hi all, > > I recently built a new system with an ASRock B450M Pro4 motherboard. I literally fired up a new system with the exact same board today and saw the temp sensors didn't appear to be supported, so I'm very happy that you

mail(1): move command wrappers to cmd.c

2019-12-15 Thread me
To dispatch commands typed by the user onto C functions, mail(1) uses an array of struct with function pointers (cmdtab.c, with implementation in cmd1.c, cmd2.c and cmd3.c). I propose merging all these 3+1 files into cmd.c, with all the code that is not directly a command wrapper moved away to a d

Re: ospf6d: rework priority handling

2019-12-15 Thread Remi Locherer
reads good to me (but I did not test). On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 09:56:15AM +0100, Denis Fondras wrote: > > Index: kroute.c > === > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d/kroute.c,v > retrieving revision 1.61 > diff -u -p -r1.61 kroute.c >

Re: attention please: host's IP stack behavior got changed slightly

2019-12-15 Thread Daniel Jakots
On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 15:17:26 +0100, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote: > > Should the rdr-to rule still work? I fixed it with using the "Port > > foo" directive in my sshd config (and a simple "pass in to port > > foo") in the meantime. > > My earlier indeed change omits your usecase. The rdr rule

Re: ospf6d: rework priority handling

2019-12-15 Thread Sebastian Benoit
reads ok. unrelated to this diff: I wonder if the manpage (of both ospfd and pspf6d) should mention that changing fib-priority with a reload is equivalent toa uncouple/couple? Denis Fondras(open...@ledeuns.net) on 2019.12.15 09:56:15 +0100: > > Index: kroute.c >

Re: attention please: host's IP stack behavior got changed slightly

2019-12-15 Thread Alexandr Nedvedicky
Hello Daniel, thanks for reporting back. > Should the rdr-to rule still work? I fixed it with using the "Port foo" > directive in my sshd config (and a simple "pass in to port foo") in the > meantime. My earlier indeed change omits your usecase. The rdr rule should still work. Patch bel

ospf6d: rework priority handling

2019-12-15 Thread Denis Fondras
Index: kroute.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d/kroute.c,v retrieving revision 1.61 diff -u -p -r1.61 kroute.c --- kroute.c12 Dec 2019 08:21:34 - 1.61 +++ kroute.c15 Dec 2019 08:42:10 - @@ -97,10 +97,11 @@