Hello,
This morning I was surprised to see a who(1) unveil violation in a
lastcomm(1) report, so I looked into it and found that when requesting
show_idle (-u flag) or show_term (-T flag), we indeed try to read
_PATH_DEV, which isn't unveiled yet.
I'm not an unveil(2) expert, and there might be
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 07:00:22AM -0400, David Goerger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This morning I was surprised to see a who(1) unveil violation in a
> lastcomm(1) report, so I looked into it and found that when requesting
> show_idle (-u flag) or show_term (-T flag), we indeed try to read
> _PATH_DEV, w