Re: ftp: allow specifying supported protocols

2020-09-05 Thread Theo Buehler
On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 12:55:17AM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Sat, Sep 05 2020, Theo Buehler wrote: > > I found this small diff useful more than once (admittedly for debugging). > > It allows specifying the protocols that may be used by ftp the same way > > as nc -Tprotocols

Re: ldapd: adding bsd.schema

2020-09-05 Thread Aisha Tammy
Sorry for the late reply. On 8/12/20 8:19 AM, Robert Klein wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 09:00:18 +0200 > Theo Buehler wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 10:22:51PM -0400, Aisha Tammy wrote: >>> Another bump. >> >> I think this is useful and am ok with this. >> >> Are there any

Re: ftp: allow specifying supported protocols

2020-09-05 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Sat, Sep 05 2020, Theo Buehler wrote: > I found this small diff useful more than once (admittedly for debugging). > It allows specifying the protocols that may be used by ftp the same way > as nc -Tprotocols works. For example: > > $ ftp -Sprotocols=tlsv1.2:tlsv1.1 https://example.com/file > >

ftp: allow specifying supported protocols

2020-09-05 Thread Theo Buehler
I found this small diff useful more than once (admittedly for debugging). It allows specifying the protocols that may be used by ftp the same way as nc -Tprotocols works. For example: $ ftp -Sprotocols=tlsv1.2:tlsv1.1 https://example.com/file Perhaps someone else has use for it, too? Index:

Re: amd64: add tsc_delay(), a TSC-based delay(9) implementation

2020-09-05 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 09:49:25 -0500 > From: Scott Cheloha > Cc: Mark Kettenis , Mike Larkin > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 12:22:19PM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 12:12:36PM -0700, Mike Larkin

Re: amd64: add tsc_delay(), a TSC-based delay(9) implementation

2020-09-05 Thread Scott Cheloha
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 12:22:19PM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 12:12:36PM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 01:55:45AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 18:11:12 -0500 > > > > From: Scott Cheloha > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > >

Re: incorrect result from getppid for ptraced processes

2020-09-05 Thread Vitaliy Makkoveev
> On 5 Sep 2020, at 03:22, Philip Guenther wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 2:59 PM Mateusz Guzik wrote: > >> On 9/5/20, Philip Guenther wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 1:06 PM Mateusz Guzik wrote: >>> On 9/4/20, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 05:24:42PM

Re: httpd.conf.5 TLS defaults

2020-09-05 Thread Navan Carson
> On Sep 4, 2020, at 9:07 PM, Theo Buehler wrote: > > ´╗┐On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 08:48:48PM -0700, na...@airpost.net wrote: >> This is TLS v1.2 & 1.3 now. Delete it here, since the referenced man page is >> updated. > > Thanks, I'm ok with this diff. I had the diff below in my tree for a >

Re: timeout(9): add clock-based timeouts (attempt 2)

2020-09-05 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:55:39 -0500 > From: Scott Cheloha > > On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 08:46:08PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > I want to add clock-based timeouts to the kernel because tick-based > > timeouts suffer from a few problems: > > > > [...] > > > > Basically,

Re: timeout(9): add clock-based timeouts (attempt 2)

2020-09-05 Thread Todd Carson
Scott Cheloha writes: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 05:55:40PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 08:46:08PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote: >> > Basically, ticks are a poor approximation for the system clock. We >> > should use the real thing where possible. >> > >> > [...] >> >

Re: clang warning in vmctl

2020-09-05 Thread Theo Buehler
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 01:49:02PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > I had this diff in my tree for a while, but haven't gotten around > to passing it up. > > there are other warnings in the tree, found by newer clang, that > people should review. Some of them are just noise, in particular >