Re: [CAN IGNORE] Proposal for new bc(1) and dc(1)

2021-07-29 Thread Gavin Howard
Hello, At this point, because of the lack of reply, I am going to assume that my proposal is rejected. While I am sad, I understand. Thank you for taking the time to consider my proposal. Gavin Howard

Re: WIP iwx(4) Tx aggregation

2021-07-29 Thread Hrvoje Popovski
On 29.7.2021. 18:05, Stefan Sperling wrote: > This is an updated patch which has been rebased on top of -current. > Make sure that your tree is fully synced up to r1.86 of if_iwx.c before > applying this patch. > > This patch includes the small change to ieee80211_input.c I sent here: >

Re: sleep.3: miscellaneous cleanup and rewrites

2021-07-29 Thread Todd C . Miller
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:15:09 -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote: > We do it for other library functions where some part of the > functionality is implemented with a system call. In other manpages we > say something like: > > The > .Fn foo > function may fail and set > .Va errno > for any of the errors

Re: WIP iwx(4) Tx aggregation

2021-07-29 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 08:20:23PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote: > On 30.6.2021. 13:28, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 08:37:11PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > >> This patch attempts to implement Tx aggregation support for iwx(4). > >> > >> It is not yet ready to be committed

net80211: initialize Tx agg sequence number

2021-07-29 Thread Stefan Sperling
The sequence numbers for QoS data frames sent with Tx aggregation are implicitly initialized to 0 when the system boots. From then on the counters will simply keep incrementing with a wrap after 0xfff. This isn't a problem with iwn(4) or iwm(4) because we always send the current value in 'add

Re: sleep.3: miscellaneous cleanup and rewrites

2021-07-29 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Scott, Scott Cheloha wrote on Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 05:15:09PM -0500: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 10:37:03AM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote: >> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 07:55:00 -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote: >>> Still wondering whether we need an Errors section to mention that >>> sleep(3) can set errno.

Re: Do not spin on the NET_LOCK() in kqueue

2021-07-29 Thread Alexander Bluhm
> > New diff fixing a locking dance pointed out by visa@. Not tested this one yet. But here is a combination of all the others. http://bluhm.genua.de/perform/results/2021-07-27T07:41:29Z/perform.html bluhm

Re: Do not spin on the NET_LOCK() in kqueue

2021-07-29 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 09:51:43AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 26/07/21(Mon) 09:23, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > On 26/07/21(Mon) 08:55, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > > On 21/07/21(Wed) 10:18, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > > > On 11/07/21(Sun) 14:45, Visa Hankala wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Jul 10,

Re: iwx(4) firmware update to -63

2021-07-29 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 02:13:41PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 06:21:46PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > This patch implements support for new iwx(4) -63 firmware images > > available in the iwx-firmware-20210512 package (via fw_update). > > > > Please test this

Re: Do not spin on the NET_LOCK() in kqueue

2021-07-29 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 26/07/21(Mon) 09:23, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 26/07/21(Mon) 08:55, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > On 21/07/21(Wed) 10:18, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > > On 11/07/21(Sun) 14:45, Visa Hankala wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 05:26:57PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > > > > One of the reasons