> On 28 Oct 2021, at 15:35, Jason McIntyre wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 01:27:17PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>>
>>> that strategy does rely on individual driver docs saying upfront that
>>> they can be created though, even if using create is not common. i wonder if
>>> ifconfig already
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 01:27:17PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>
> > that strategy does rely on individual driver docs saying upfront that
> > they can be created though, even if using create is not common. i wonder if
> > ifconfig already knows what it can create, and could maybe be more
> > helpf
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 02:32:31PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:12:35AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2021/10/27 17:44, David Gwynne wrote:
> > >
> > > > benno@ suggested I look at vether(4) to adapt the text related to
> > > > bridge(4) but I'm not sure how to
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:12:35AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/10/27 17:44, David Gwynne wrote:
> >
> > > benno@ suggested I look at vether(4) to adapt the text related to
> > > bridge(4) but I'm not sure how to rewrite it properly for veb(4).
> >
> > i get that, but for a different
Looks good. Nice to see this moving forward. Thanks.
On 2021-10-27 21:13 +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 02:29:50PM -0500, Aaron Poffenberger wrote:
> > Ping.
> >
> > Will someone commit this? Seems like no one knows about /upgrade.site and it
> > fits well with sysupgrade(
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:56:16 +0100, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Maybe it's not sufficient, but:
>
> sysDescr OBJECT-TYPE
> SYNTAX DisplayString (SIZE (0..255))
> MAX-ACCESS read-only
> STATUS current
> DESCRIPTION
> "A textual description of the entity. This
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 02:29:50PM -0500, Aaron Poffenberger wrote:
> Ping.
>
> Will someone commit this? Seems like no one knows about /upgrade.site and it
> fits well with sysupgrade(8).
sysupgrade(8) is one potential /upgrade.site user but I disagree about
documenting the latter through the fo
On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 14:14 -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 17:14:28 +0100, Martijn van Duren wrote:
>
> > Trying to search for memory leaks in my new snmpd code I found some
> > harmless, but annoying ones in system from SNMPv2-MIB.
> >
> > We call uname(3) every time (even if
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 17:14:28 +0100, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Trying to search for memory leaks in my new snmpd code I found some
> harmless, but annoying ones in system from SNMPv2-MIB.
>
> We call uname(3) every time (even if we don't even need info from
> that call) and ones set we save it unt
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:32:31 +0100
Jason McIntyre :
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:12:35AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2021/10/27 17:44, David Gwynne wrote:
> > >
> > > > benno@ suggested I look at vether(4) to adapt the text related to
> > > > bridge(4) but I'm not sure how to rewrit
On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 17:37 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/10/27 17:14, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > Trying to search for memory leaks in my new snmpd code I found some
> > harmless, but annoying ones in system from SNMPv2-MIB.
> >
> > We call uname(3) every time (even if we don't even n
On 2021/10/27 17:14, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Trying to search for memory leaks in my new snmpd code I found some
> harmless, but annoying ones in system from SNMPv2-MIB.
>
> We call uname(3) every time (even if we don't even need info from
> that call) and ones set we save it until forever.
>
Trying to search for memory leaks in my new snmpd code I found some
harmless, but annoying ones in system from SNMPv2-MIB.
We call uname(3) every time (even if we don't even need info from
that call) and ones set we save it until forever.
Diff below calls uname(3) only a single time and if the va
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:12:35AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/10/27 17:44, David Gwynne wrote:
> >
> > > benno@ suggested I look at vether(4) to adapt the text related to
> > > bridge(4) but I'm not sure how to rewrite it properly for veb(4).
> >
> > i get that, but for a different
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 07:28:32 +1000
David Gwynne :
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 09:18:30PM +0200, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> > I tried to figure out how to use veb interfaces but the man page
> > wasn't obvious in regards to the "vport" thing. It turns out it's
> > a kind of interface that can be created
On 2021/10/27 17:44, David Gwynne wrote:
>
> > benno@ suggested I look at vether(4) to adapt the text related to
> > bridge(4) but I'm not sure how to rewrite it properly for veb(4).
>
> i get that, but for a different reason. im too close to veb/vport, so i
> think it's all very obvious.
>
> ma
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 08:34:48AM +0200, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 07:28:32 +1000
> David Gwynne :
>
> > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 09:18:30PM +0200, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> > > I tried to figure out how to use veb interfaces but the man page
> > > wasn't obvious in regards to the
17 matches
Mail list logo
