On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 09:25:22AM -0500, David Hill wrote:
Hello David,
>>> I think I found the bug that causes crashes in X for some people.
> The first diff did not help, but this one has kept my X stable for 12 hours
> so far...
I haven't got quite as far as 12 hours with it, yet, but I've s
> On Nov 17, 2021, at 03:22, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>
> On 16/11/21(Tue) 13:55, Visa Hankala wrote:
>> Currently, dopselect() and doppoll() call tsleep_nsec() without retry.
>> cheloha@ asked if the functions should handle spurious wakeups. I guess
>> such wakeups are unlikely with the nowake wa
In wc(1) we currently count words, both ASCII and multibyte, in a
getline(3) loop.
This makes sense in the multibyte case because stdio handles all the
nasty buffer resizing for us. We avoid splitting a multibyte between
two read(2) calls and the resulting code is simpler.
However, for ASCII inp
On 11/16/21 18:21, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 11:26:40PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
Hi,
I think I found the bug that causes crashes in X for some people.
If X started crashing since you upgraded to the last snapshots, can
you try the patch below ?
get /usr/xenocara from
On 16.11.2021. 0:08, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 15.11.2021. 16:44, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>> On 15.11.2021. 15:04, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 02:51:16PM +0100, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>>>
>>> And you don'n see "> tdb_free() killing ourself" in dmesg
>>> output?
>>
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 08:51:38AM +0100, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
> Like umb(4), sppp(4) natively learns DNS information. Among the
> differences between these two devices is that umb prints this
> information from ifconfig(8) and sppp does not. I would like to equalize
> this behaviour, and add the
On 16/11/21(Tue) 13:55, Visa Hankala wrote:
> Currently, dopselect() and doppoll() call tsleep_nsec() without retry.
> cheloha@ asked if the functions should handle spurious wakeups. I guess
> such wakeups are unlikely with the nowake wait channel, but I am not
> sure if that is a safe guess.
I'm
This is Joel's diff, extracted from the jumbo diff.
If there is an interface config but no "send client id" option, send the
default as the man page claims we would do.
This is OK florian, or if someone wants to give me an OK...
diff --git frontend.c frontend.c
index e4b2419c96a..4984cb63e06 100
On 2021-11-16 09:56 -07, Joel Knight wrote:
> Hi. On a firewall recently upgraded to 7.0, I noticed that dhcpleased
> was not getting a reply from my ISP's DHCP server during renewal at
> T1. At T2, dhcpleased would broadcast the REQUEST which would be
> answered. Testing with dhclient showed succ