On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 01:30:36PM -0500, Brian Conway wrote:
>
> Reviving this thread, apologies for discontinuity in mail readers:
> https://marc.info/?t=16564219358
>
> After rebasing on 7.3, my results have mirrored Hrvoje's testing at the end
> of that thread. No issues with
On 2023/04/13 16:45, Sonic wrote:
> Is this multiqueue support in 7.3 or does it require patching?
> According to Intel the i211 should have 2 queues but I see no msi-x
> support in dmesg:
> em0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I211" rev 0x03: msi, address
It is not committed, there's a diff.
Is this multiqueue support in 7.3 or does it require patching?
According to Intel the i211 should have 2 queues but I see no msi-x
support in dmesg:
em0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I211" rev 0x03: msi, address
Thanks.
Chris
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023, at 2:45 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2023/04/13 13:30, Brian Conway wrote:
>> Reviving this thread, apologies for discontinuity in mail readers:
>> https://marc.info/?t=16564219358
>>
>> After rebasing on 7.3, my results have mirrored Hrvoje's testing at the end
>>
On 2023/04/13 13:30, Brian Conway wrote:
> Reviving this thread, apologies for discontinuity in mail readers:
> https://marc.info/?t=16564219358
>
> After rebasing on 7.3, my results have mirrored Hrvoje's testing at the end
> of that thread. No issues with throughput, unusual latency, or
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 07:56:35PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> Silences -Wdeprecated-non-prototype warnings emitted by clang 15.
OK bluhm@
> Index: base64.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libkeynote/base64.c,v
> retrieving revision
Reviving this thread, apologies for discontinuity in mail readers:
https://marc.info/?t=16564219358
After rebasing on 7.3, my results have mirrored Hrvoje's testing at the end of
that thread. No issues with throughput, unusual latency, or reliability.
`vmstat -i` shows some level of
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 05:50:43PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 09, 2023 at 12:17:35PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 09, 2023 at 10:08:25AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Apr 09, 2023 at 09:15:12AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Apr 09,
Silences -Wdeprecated-non-prototype warnings emitted by clang 15.
Index: base64.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libkeynote/base64.c,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.11 base64.c
--- base64.c29 Jun 2004 11:35:56 -
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 23:27:08 +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> The iwm_updatechan and iwx_updatechan callbacks are not reachable
> because they were never wired up. Only the iwn driver already has
> this callback pointer set as intended.
>
> With the patch below iwm/iwx should get triggered when an
start_watchdog() and reset_watchdog() exist, but stop logic is inlined.
Giving it a name seems better.
No functional change.
Feedback? Objection? OK?
Questions wrt. upgrade.site(5) prompted me to look at whether execution of
/upgrade.site execution is subject to this timeout: it is, finish_up()
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 03:48:40PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Seen while working on similar code. There is no need to make the
> composition of IMSG_CTL_SHOW_RIB_COMMUNITIES so complicated.
ok
>
> --
> :wq Claudio
>
> Index: rde.c
>
Seen while working on similar code. There is no need to make the
composition of IMSG_CTL_SHOW_RIB_COMMUNITIES so complicated.
--
:wq Claudio
Index: rde.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/bgpd/rde.c,v
retrieving revision 1.600
diff
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 02:17:48PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 05:33:10PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > This is the first big amount of flowspec specific code.
> > It adds a new file (flowspec.c) which exposes basic API functions to work
> > with flowspec. Right now
On 2023-04-12 23:27 +02, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> The iwm_updatechan and iwx_updatechan callbacks are not reachable
> because they were never wired up. Only the iwn driver already has
> this callback pointer set as intended.
>
> With the patch below iwm/iwx should get triggered when an AP
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 05:33:10PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> This is the first big amount of flowspec specific code.
> It adds a new file (flowspec.c) which exposes basic API functions to work
> with flowspec. Right now apart from the regress test nothing uses these
> functions (but don't
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 01:23:23PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 12:25:46PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > bgpctl help output follows no clear order. I decided to sort all
> > keywords and flags alphabetically. Also fixup the manpage a bit since
> > some additions where
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 12:25:46PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> bgpctl help output follows no clear order. I decided to sort all
> keywords and flags alphabetically. Also fixup the manpage a bit since
> some additions where added in the wrong spot.
>
> I think the output of 'bgpctl show rib
bgpctl help output follows no clear order. I decided to sort all
keywords and flags alphabetically. Also fixup the manpage a bit since
some additions where added in the wrong spot.
I think the output of 'bgpctl show rib help' is the worst (both before and
after). It is long and some keywords are
19 matches
Mail list logo
