Re: remove net.inet6.ip6.soiikey from userland

2023-05-20 Thread Florian Obser
On 2023-05-20 19:37 +02, Paul de Weerd wrote: > On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 05:33:11PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote: > | In case this turns out to be useful for unlocking work in the kernel. > | > | It's a minimum diff, if we want to go this way we probably want to move > | init_soiikey() to the

Re: remove net.inet6.ip6.soiikey from userland

2023-05-20 Thread Paul de Weerd
On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 05:33:11PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote: | In case this turns out to be useful for unlocking work in the kernel. | | It's a minimum diff, if we want to go this way we probably want to move | init_soiikey() to the engine process and stop bouncing through the main | process

remove net.inet6.ip6.soiikey from userland

2023-05-20 Thread Florian Obser
In case this turns out to be useful for unlocking work in the kernel. It's a minimum diff, if we want to go this way we probably want to move init_soiikey() to the engine process and stop bouncing through the main process when an interface changes. This changes behaviour: in -current we can

Virtio fix for testing

2023-05-20 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Hi, with help from Aaron Mason, I have found the problem responsible for the vioscsi panic on oracle cloud and windows qemu. Basically before using any virt-queues, the guest must set the DRIVER_OK status bit, or the host may not process the queues. This affects vioscsi(4) and viogpu(4) in

Re: Fix wrong interface mtu in tcp_mss

2023-05-20 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 07:58:47PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote: > Hi, > > We use the wrong interface and mtu in tcp_mss() to calculate the mss if > the destination address points is a local address. In ip_output() we > use the correct interface and its mtu. > > This limits the mss to 1448 if the

Re: patch: profiling using utrace(2) (compatible with pledge and unveil)

2023-05-20 Thread Sebastien Marie
Hi, I am getting back to gmon/profil(2), replying to all feedback. Sorry for the delay. On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 08:45:39AM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote: > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 09:28:31AM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote: > > > One place where I needed to cheat a bit is at moncontrol(0) call in >

Re: ypldap: try servers until one succeeds

2023-05-20 Thread Theo Buehler
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 04:17:16PM +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote: > We sometimes run into situations where one of the three servers a ypldap > can talk to will accept a TCP connection but won't do TLS properly, or won't > perform LDAP searches. ypldap currently only tries servers until one