Klemens Nanni(k...@openbsd.org) on 2023.10.26 13:28:42 +:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 09:09:21AM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 06:54:30AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > - parse.y still accepting undocumented "ssl" with a warning since 2014
> > > - more
On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 09:59:25AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Right now when we register a region with below that an instance we
> can revert back in the tree. When we request below the instance we
> currently use appl_region_next() to find the next region and simply
> set the to be find
Right now when we register a region with below that an instance we
can revert back in the tree. When we request below the instance we
currently use appl_region_next() to find the next region and simply
set the to be find oid to the the oid of the new region. In the
situation described above this
On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 09:41:55AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> In most cases when a region is registered we have the full ownership.
> As soon as a region has been registered below prior mentioned region we
> could loose ownership halfway through. This case currently isn't fully
> tested and
On Sat, 2023-10-28 at 09:45 +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> RFC 2741 section 5.2 states that searchrange.end is non-inclusive.
> appl_varbind_valid() and appl_response() currently tests inclusive.
> The appl_varbind_valid() case is for backends that support
> searchrange.end (like agentx) and
On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 09:45:25AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> RFC 2741 section 5.2 states that searchrange.end is non-inclusive.
> appl_varbind_valid() and appl_response() currently tests inclusive.
> The appl_varbind_valid() case is for backends that support
> searchrange.end (like agentx)
RFC 2741 section 5.2 states that searchrange.end is non-inclusive.
appl_varbind_valid() and appl_response() currently tests inclusive.
The appl_varbind_valid() case is for backends that support
searchrange.end (like agentx) and the appl_response() case for
those who do not and need a fixup
In most cases when a region is registered we have the full ownership.
As soon as a region has been registered below prior mentioned region we
could loose ownership halfway through. This case currently isn't fully
tested and with indices we can return OIDs >= searchrange.end.
The easiest way is to
