On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:31:53AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I would be happy wit such unification.
>
> Are there any objectors?
>
> (finishing this might need to be put off for about a month, tho)
>
I am currently building base with a diff that converts SIMPLEQ_* to STAILQ_*
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 08:18:16AM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> Singly-linked tail queues are functionally equivalent to the "simple
> queues" we already have. Do we really need two implementations of
> what are effectively the same thing or should we just define STAIL_*
> in terms of SIMPLEQ_*
I don't know if it is useful to anyone else but it is required by lsquic, a
library that implements QUIC / HTTP3.
Index: share/man/man3/queue.3
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man3/queue.3,v
retrieving revision 1.66
diff -u -p
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 07:53:23PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> OK?
>
OK denis@
> diff --git slaacd.c slaacd.c
> index 58f15bcda37..dae2eab3434 100644
> --- slaacd.c
> +++ slaacd.c
> @@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ configure_gateway(struct imsg_configure_dfr *dfr, uint8_t
> rtm_type)
>
Handle connected routes as ospfd(8) does.
(diff to ospf6d and ospf6ctl)
Index: ospf6ctl/ospf6ctl.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6ctl/ospf6ctl.c,v
retrieving revision 1.50
diff -u -p -r1.50 ospf6ctl.c
--- ospf6ctl/ospf6ctl.c
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 05:00:11PM +0100, Remi Locherer wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 05:25:45PM +0100, Denis Fondras wrote:
> > Biggest chunk is rework of rde_asext_get()/rde_asext_put().
> > Also change get_net_link() and get_rtr_link() to work like ospfd couterpart.
>
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 11:41:55AM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> If tar can't create intermediate directories due to permission
> issues, the resulting message is confusing:
>
> ./tar xf gcc.tar gcc-8.3.0/include/obstack.h
> tar: Unable to create gcc-8.3.0/include/obstack.h: No such file or
Biggest chunk is rework of rde_asext_get()/rde_asext_put().
Also change get_net_link() and get_rtr_link() to work like ospfd couterpart.
Index: rde.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d/rde.c,v
retrieving revision 1.84
diff -u -p
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 12:54:20PM -0300, Fernando Gont wrote:
> Folks,
>
> This improves IPv6 SLAAC handling of renumbering scenarios. At the time of
> this writing, this doesn't follow the spec, but is the right thing.
>
> Essentially, PIOs will employ these default values:
> Preferred
3 changes in rde_lsdb.c
- lsa_find_lsid() has redondant parameters
- call to lsa_self() can be simplified (== ospfd)
- update debug messages to be more suitable
Index: rde.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d/rde.c,v
retrieving
3 changes in rde_lsdb.c
- lsa_find_lsid() has redondant parameters
- call to lsa_self() can be simplified (== ospfd)
- update debug messages to be more suitable
Index: rde.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d/rde.c,v
retrieving
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 09:35:06AM +0100, Remi Locherer wrote:
> > @@ -235,6 +233,7 @@ lsa_check(struct rde_nbr *nbr, struct ls
> > case LSA_TYPE_NETWORK:
> > if ((len % sizeof(u_int32_t)) ||
> > len < sizeof(lsa->hdr) + sizeof(u_int32_t)) {
> > +
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 09:41:28AM +0100, Remi Locherer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 05:08:26PM +0100, Denis Fondras wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 11:04:16PM +0100, Remi Locherer wrote:
> > > This makes the interface setting "type p2p" configurable globally
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 09:31:36AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> So the 'Last error:' message for sessions that failed do often not include
> the suberror and also it is only shown for NOTIFICATIONS we sent but not
> for received notifications. The following diff fixes this.
>
> So instead of:
>
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 11:04:16PM +0100, Remi Locherer wrote:
> This makes the interface setting "type p2p" configurable globally or
> per area. ospf(6)d allows this for almost all interface related settings.
>
> As a side-effect of this diff ospf(6)d -nv prints "type p2p" also for
>
No need to pass peerid to lsa_snap()
While at it, remove unused variable.
Index: rde.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d/rde.c,v
retrieving revision 1.82
diff -u -p -r1.82 rde.c
--- rde.c 2 Jan 2020 10:16:46 -
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 04:32:24PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> This changes bgpd to only use CLOCK_MONOTONIC via the getmonotime()
> function. Additionally it changes the export of RIB entries to report the
> last modified time relative to now. Other places also needed some fixup,
> like the mrt
On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 09:14:48AM +0100, Remi Locherer wrote:
> > I have a diff to allow parameters after interface or area definition.
> > Not sure if we want to do that though.
>
> I would appreciate that! ;-)
>
The ospfd diff needs some more work. Crypt authentication handling is not
On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 11:11:36PM +0100, Remi Locherer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> interface-specific parameters can be defined globally or per area.
> But they are applied to the interfaces only if the interfaces are
> declared afterwards.
>
I have a diff to allow parameters after interface or area
Sync with ospfd's hello.c
Index: hello.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d/hello.c,v
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -p -r1.21 hello.c
--- hello.c 23 Dec 2019 11:25:41 - 1.21
+++ hello.c 2 Jan 2020 16:11:19
This is mostly log messages sync.
Index: database.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d/database.c,v
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -p -r1.18 database.c
--- database.c 23 Dec 2019 07:33:49 - 1.18
+++ database.c 2 Jan
Nothing fancy here, just some cleaning work.
Index: control.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d/control.c,v
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -p -r1.27 control.c
--- control.c 1 Sep 2018 19:21:10 - 1.27
+++ control.c
On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 06:35:28PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> The imsg processing in the RDE is sometimes a bit unfair. The problem is
> that peers sending many UPDATES starve out the others especially on
> intial table dumps. This comes from the fact that imsg are processed to
> completion and
Rename orig_rtr_lsa_area() to orig_rtr_lsa()
Now that area is part of iface, original orig_rtr_lsa() is useless. Also
verifying that area != NULL is not needed in some cases (these are leftovers of
the previous diff).
Index: interface.c
Refactor link state ack/req in ospf6d so it looks closer to ospfd.
Index: lsack.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d/lsack.c,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 lsack.c
--- lsack.c 11 Dec 2019 21:33:56 - 1.7
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 11:09:42PM +0100, Remi Locherer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this brings support for interface "type p2p" to ospf6d (ospfd got it a few
> weeks ago).
>
> The configuration looks like this:
>
> area 0.0.0.0 {
> interface em0 {
> type p2p
> }
> }
>
> OK?
>
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 03:53:23PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 03:24:31PM +0100, Remi Locherer wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 08:36:41PM +0100, Denis Fondras wrote:
> > > Add basic regress test to ospf6d.
> >
> > Works for me. OK remi@
&
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 10:06:40PM +0100, Remi Locherer wrote:
> this is similar to ospfd's hello.c rev 1.23.
>
> OK?
>
> Remi
>
>
> Index: hello.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d/hello.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.19
>
Add basic regress test to ospf6d.
Index: ospf6d/Makefile
===
RCS file: ospf6d/Makefile
diff -N ospf6d/Makefile
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -
+++ ospf6d/Makefile 22 Dec 2019 19:27:27 -
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+# $OpenBSD$
area is now part of struct iface
Code looks cleaner and more like ospfd.
Index: area.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d/area.c,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.4 area.c
--- area.c 28 Dec 2008 20:08:31 -
Trivial diff to scale send buffer on socket.
Index: interface.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d/interface.c,v
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -p -r1.25 interface.c
--- interface.c 28 Jun 2019 13:32:49 - 1.25
+++
Rename and move calc_nexthop_clear()/calc_nexthop_add() to
vertex_nexthop_clear()/vertex_nexthop_add()
It brings ospf6d closer to ospfd.
Index: rde.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d/rde.h,v
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 04:07:11PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> unrelated to this diff: I wonder if the manpage (of both ospfd and pspf6d)
> should mention that changing fib-priority with a reload is equivalent toa
> uncouple/couple?
>
If I understand correctly what you mean, I don't think
Index: kroute.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d/kroute.c,v
retrieving revision 1.61
diff -u -p -r1.61 kroute.c
--- kroute.c12 Dec 2019 08:21:34 - 1.61
+++ kroute.c15 Dec 2019 08:42:10 -
@@ -97,10 +97,11
As the subject says.
By request of remi@ (https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=157635822315646=2)
Index: database.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d/database.c,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -p -r1.17 database.c
--- database.c
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 10:15:36PM +0100, Remi Locherer wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 12:05:57PM +0100, Denis Fondras wrote:
> > Still working towards bringing ospf6d and ospfd closer.
> >
> > area is now part of struct iface.
>
> Makes sense to me.
>
> >
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 05:18:17PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> This diff changes the way session or peer related imsgs are handled.
> Instead of passing the imsg.hdr.peerid down and doing the lookup for the
> peer in each function move that code up into the imsg handler.
> The plan is to add an
Still working towards bringing ospf6d and ospfd closer.
area is now part of struct iface.
redist_list is part of struct area.
Some changes, related to reloading, are not in use now but it feels like the
right time to get it in.
Denis
Index: area.c
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 12:52:34PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 08:46:01PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > vm.conf(5) states it must be `owner user[:group]' or `owner group', not
> > specifying a value is undocumented and ought to be invalid syntax, yet
> > `owner' is
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 07:06:26PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> While it makes sense to pass the ibuf like in ospfd I see no reason to
> switch to sendmsg(). In ospfd this is done to prepend the IP header but
> that seems not needed here. Is there another reason to switch to
> sendmsg()?
>
Use sendmsg() instead of sendto() like ospfd(8) does.
Index: database.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d/database.c,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -p -r1.16 database.c
--- database.c 10 May 2019 13:50:34 - 1.16
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 09:51:12PM +0100, Remi Locherer wrote:
> Unfortunately redistribute does not work anymore.
>
Indeed, simple tests are too simple...
Here is an updated diff.
Index: kroute.c
===
RCS file:
Give some love to ospf6d.
The goal is to have ospf6d looks like ospfd, this could be useful to have
changes made in one daemon from one go inside the other.
I will do it step by step until I get to the point where "ospf6ctl reload"
works.
First step is to refactor kernel route message handling,
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 05:46:52PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> The output processing in bgpctl is not very extensible. And output flags
> like ssv have to hacked into the output in a bad way.
>
> This is the first bit of a much bigger shuffling action to make the output
> handling more
Fix function name in error message.
Index: kroute.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospfd/kroute.c,v
retrieving revision 1.112
diff -u -p -r1.112 kroute.c
--- kroute.c28 Dec 2018 19:25:10 - 1.112
+++ kroute.c9 Nov
Newer version after a comment by claudio@.
Currently ospfd logs routing message type code instead of name.
Make it more explicit.
remi@ is OK but wonders if rtm_type_name() will be updated as needed.
What do you think ?
Denis
Index: kroute.c
Currently ospfd logs routing message type code instead of name.
Make it more explicit.
remi@ is OK but wonders if rtm_type_name() will be updated as needed (that's why
I also log the typecode)
What do you think ?
Denis
Index: kroute.c
document ip.arpq and remove ip, ip6 and mpls ifq.
Index: sysctl.2
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/sys/sysctl.2,v
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -p -r1.27 sysctl.2
--- sysctl.29 May 2019 15:05:47 - 1.27
+++ sysctl.2
Hello,
Here is a diff to allow selection of packages to install.
My routers do not need X or games to be installed.
$ doas sysupgrade -s -CGMX
SHA256.sig 100%
|***|
2141 00:00
Signature Verified
INSTALL.amd64
Hi,
In tcpdump.c, at line 471 :
i = pcap_snapshot(pd);
if (snaplen < i) {
warning("snaplen raised from %d to %d", snaplen, i);
snaplen = i;
}
is only useful when reading a pcap file. In other cases, pd->snapshot = snaplen
(set in
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 09:03:41PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> When using a rule forcing the nexthop to a specific address bgpd
> currently does not mark that nexthop as no-modify. In other words
> the default rules for nexthop propagation applies. This means that
> for ebgp it only sends out
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 07:37:07PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> getpeerbyid() is currently walking the peer list to find the right one.
> This is rather inefficent once you have more then a handful of peers.
> Switch it to a RB tree and save a lot of time:
>
OK denis@
> Before:
> %
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 10:58:51PM +0200, Remi Locherer wrote:
> Hi tech@,
>
> David sent a diff for ospfd which allows specifying an area by number
> as well as id.
> --> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=155650284619263=2
>
> This diff does the same for ospf6d and ospf6ctl without modifying
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 11:15:03PM +0200, Remi Locherer wrote:
> Any opinions or comments on this? I think this would be a valuable addition
> to ospfd.
>
I can't see any harm in it.
OK denis@
> >
> > Below diff changes ospfctl to accept the address and number format for
> > "ospfct show
When router-id is unspecified, ospfd will choose the lowest IP address of the
host. I added an area and an IP lower than the existing ones and on reload
ospfd asked me to restart and did not activate the new area.
Why would it update the router-id in such a case ?
This diff changes this
additional "s" laying around.
Index: printconf.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ripd/printconf.c,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 printconf.c
--- printconf.c 31 Dec 2018 20:34:16 - 1.7
+++ printconf.c 12 May 2019
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 01:15:16PM -0400, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> What is wrong with "default"? Why is "0.0.0.0/0" and "::/0" better?
>
Nothing wrong per-se. I was comparing the output of "bgpctl sh fib" and "route
show" when I noticed this.
When using "route -n", also print numeric value for default route.
Before :
[denis@jig-ai] route -n show -inet6
Routing tables
Internet6:
DestinationGatewayFlags Refs
Use Mtu Prio Iface
default2a00:6060:1::1
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 11:55:51AM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Hi
>
> You have the right idea general idea of the problem. display-panes
> blocks the queue until it is finished, so the key press isn't processed
> until then, which is too late.
>
> But your change defeats the purpose, the
As discovered and reported by solene@, since a few day selecting a pane after
C-b q (display pane index) does not work.
>From what I understand, the number entered is sent after the select-pane
command, too late...
Here is a diff :
Index: cmd-queue.c
When transceiver is unknown (among others), a carriage return is missing.
Before :
[root@er6p:~] ifconfig cnmac0 sff
cnmac0: flags=8802 mtu 1500
lladdr 18:e8:29:b6:d4:a9
index 1 priority 0 llprio 3
media: Ethernet autoselect (none)
Noticed by visa@
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/man4.armv7/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -p -r1.24 Makefile
--- Makefile1 Feb 2019 01:41:52 - 1.24
+++ Makefile24 Apr 2019
Noticed by visa@
Index: man4.arm64/Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/man4.arm64/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.6 Makefile
--- man4.arm64/Makefile 2 Apr 2019 19:41:53 - 1.6
+++
Here is the lost manpage.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/man4.octeon/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -p -r1.13 Makefile
--- Makefile12 Jan 2019 17:07:16 - 1.13
+++ Makefile22 Apr
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 06:03:01PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 09:25:32PM +0100, Denis Fondras wrote:
> > (better when the right diff is sent...)
> >
> > ROV has been broken since the configuration reload changes.
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 10:03:15PM +1300, Richard Procter wrote:
> The ldpd issue might merit a hint in the man page as I found it difficult to
> diagnose
> as a newbie (see attached patch), and the man page, while not wrong, threw me
> by
> stating that GTSM is mandatory for LDPv6; it is now
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 09:24:34AM +0100, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> I think all the above calls for a new standalone option, which I named as
> 'Unconfigure'. Patch below suggest unconfigure behavior for PF.
> Doing 'pfctl -U' will bring PF back to its initial state (e.g. right before
>
(better when the right diff is sent...)
ROV has been broken since the configuration reload changes.
Index: rde.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/bgpd/rde.c,v
retrieving revision 1.466
diff -u -p -r1.466 rde.c
--- rde.c 13 Mar
ROV has been broken since the configuration reload changes.
Index: rde.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/bgpd/rde.c,v
retrieving revision 1.466
diff -u -p -r1.466 rde.c
--- rde.c 13 Mar 2019 14:35:39 - 1.466
+++ rde.c
There is some code that dates back to 2010 and cannot compile if
-DUSE_NPPPD_ARP.
So I guess we can safely remove.
Denis
Index: npppd/npppd.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/npppd/npppd/npppd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.49
diff -u
Simple diff to allow IPv6 through pppx(4).
Denis
Index: net/if_pppx.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_pppx.c,v
retrieving revision 1.66
diff -u -p -r1.66 if_pppx.c
--- net/if_pppx.c 11 Jul 2018 21:18:23 - 1.66
+++
Documentation better be accurate when syntax is not checked :)
Index: npppd/npppd-users.5
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/npppd/npppd/npppd-users.5,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 npppd-users.5
--- npppd/npppd-users.5 13
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 11:41:39AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> At a2k19 David (dlg@) and I sat down and looked at BGP L3 MPLS VPN
> support. Now David wants to use this in production and realized that
> in his case it would be great to have more than one mpe(4) interface per
> rdomain. This way
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 09:50:50PM +0100, Remi Locherer wrote:
> Hi tech,
>
> this allows to adjust the priority of the routes that ospf6d inserts
> into the kernel routing table.
>
> It's basically the same change that I commited to ospfd today (without
> reload support).
>
Is there any
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 03:05:15PM -0700, Denis Fondras wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvs
> Module name: src
> Changes by: de...@cvs.openbsd.org 2018/12/28 15:05:15
>
> Modified files:
> usr.sbin/bgpd : kroute.c
>
> Log message:
> move kroute_find() call
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 06:08:16PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 05:21:02PM +0100, Denis Fondras wrote:
> > int
> > +krVPN6_change(struct ktable *kt, struct kroute_full *kl, u_int8_t fib_prio)
> > +{
> > + struct kroute6_node *k
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 03:15:35PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > /*
> > * This function will have undefined behaviour if the passed in prefixlen
> > is
> > - * to large for the respective bgpd_addr address family.
> > + * too large for the respective bgpd_addr address family.
> > */
> >
The parser sets curpeer->conf.capabilities.mp to -1 before setting it to either
1 or 0 by default. Set it to 0 by default and change it to 1 when needed.
Index: parse.y
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/bgpd/parse.y,v
retrieving
Print well-known SAFI name instead of value.
* Before:
BGP (OPEN: Version 4, AS #65530, Holdtime 90, ID 10.2.2.2, Option length 44
((CAP MULTI_PROTOCOL [IPv4 Unicast], CAP MULTI_PROTOCOL [IPv4 #128], CAP
MULTI_PROTOCOL [IPv6 #128], CAP ROUTE_REFRESH, CAP GRACEFUL_RESTART [R], Time
90s (IPv4
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 03:23:07PM -0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 26/12/18(Wed) 17:13, Denis Fondras wrote:
> > Interface needs IFF_MULTICAST when enabling IPv6 as per in6_ifattach().
> > When an address is configured, the interface joins multicast groups with
> > in6_j
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 02:36:36PM -0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 25/12/18(Tue) 20:32, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Simple change to have verbose USB device fit into 80 chars in usbdevs(8):
>
> New version using 'iSerial'. This is coherent w/ what lsusb(8) displays
> and isn't ambiguous with
The previous diff was a failure. This one works and makes icmp_reflect() closer
to icmp6_reflect().
Index: netinet/ip_icmp.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet/ip_icmp.c,v
retrieving revision 1.181
diff -u -p -r1.181 ip_icmp.c
---
Please ignore, this one is broken...
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 09:27:59PM +0100, Denis Fondras wrote:
> Resend because of nasty typo :/
>
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 08:43:10PM -0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > I'm not happy with adding the IFF_MULTICAST flag and SIOC{ADD,DEL}M
Resend because of nasty typo :/
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 08:43:10PM -0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> I'm not happy with adding the IFF_MULTICAST flag and SIOC{ADD,DEL}MULTI
> ioctls. It seems to be a common pattern between in existing pseudo-driver,
> so this shouldn't block you. However I'd
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 08:43:10PM -0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> I'm not happy with adding the IFF_MULTICAST flag and SIOC{ADD,DEL}MULTI
> ioctls. It seems to be a common pattern between in existing pseudo-driver,
> so this shouldn't block you. However I'd greatly appreciate if you
> could
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 06:47:27PM -0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Index: netinet/ip_icmp.c
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet/ip_icmp.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.181
> > diff -u -p -r1.181 ip_icmp.c
> > ---
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 08:43:10PM -0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> It would be great if you could think the IPv4 version as well to take
> a 'struct sockaddr' argument instead of a `struct in_ifaddr'.
>
Here is a diff to convert "struct in_ifaddr" to "struct sockaddr"
Index: netinet/ip_icmp.c
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 04:50:17PM -0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 25/12/18(Tue) 10:25, Denis Fondras wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 08:43:10PM -0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > On 24/12/18(Mon) 17:31, Denis Fondras wrote:
> > >
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 08:43:10PM -0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 24/12/18(Mon) 17:31, Denis Fondras wrote:
> > Index: net/if_ethersubr.c
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c,v
> >
Thank you for the comments Martin. Here is an improved diff.
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 02:22:45PM -0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Comments below
>
> > Index: net/if_ethersubr.c
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c,v
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 10:05:01AM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> unless you're trying somehow to emphasise that both types of address are
> supported, you could simplify the text to just:
>
> The
> .Ar dest-address
> is used to find ...
>
Thank you for your input.
Index:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 11:42:36PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> I have no clue about MPLS, so this feedback is code-wise only:
>
> Did you consider using more AF agnostic code for parsing the IP address?
>
You are right, it is simpler. Thank you for the clue :)
Updated diff :
Index:
Allow the mpw(4) interface to establish VPLS tunnel over an IPv6-only MPLS core.
This is the ifconfig(8) bit providing display and configuration of IPv6
neighbor on mpw(4) interface.
pe1# ifconfig mpw0
mpw0: flags=51 mtu 1500
index 7 priority 0 llprio 3
encapsulation-type
Allow the mpw(4) interface to establish VPLS tunnel over an IPv6-only MPLS
core.
This is the mpw(4) bit.
It requires the kernel diff from
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=154513171617201=2 to avoid panic.
---
pe1# cat /etc/ldpd.conf
Here is a serie of diffs to enable MPLSv6, MPLS transport over IPv6.
Second diff : add support for IPv6 MPLS routes exchange with bgpd(8).
(***)
pe1# cat /etc/hostname.mpe0
rdomain 2
mplslabel 42
inet6
Here is a serie of diffs to enable MPLSv6, MPLS transport over IPv6.
First diff : allow mpe(4) to handle IPv6 trafic.
Index: net/if_ethersubr.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c,v
retrieving revision 1.255
diff -u -p
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 12:21:19PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:35:37AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 06:55:51PM +0100, Job Snijders wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 06:23:53PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at
Add basic MPLS support in libpcap.
Index: gencode.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libpcap/gencode.c,v
retrieving revision 1.51
diff -u -p -r1.51 gencode.c
--- gencode.c 10 Nov 2018 10:17:37 - 1.51
+++ gencode.c 14 Nov 2018
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 11:36:14AM +0100, Arnaud BRAND wrote:
> Any feedback on this patch ?
> I'm running it without problems since the 30th November.
>
>
> Index: netinet6/icmp6.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet6/icmp6.c,v
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 05:59:26PM +0100, Julien Dhaille wrote:
> Hi. I am using bgpd within a rdomain (1).
> After the upgrade to 6.4 stable, I can’t announce prefixes anymore via
> bgpctl :
>
> router# ps aux -o rtable|grep bgp
>
> root 4039 0.0 0.1 300 1292 p0 S+p 5:12PM
101 - 200 of 335 matches
Mail list logo
