In revision 1.35 EI_BRAND was removed in conjunction with EI_OSABI and
EI_ABIVERSION being added, but it looks like this has not been reflected
in elf(5). The only place EI_BRAND appears in OpenBSD's current source
tree is this man page, as such I think it's worth removing.
For a quick comparison
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 07:26:42PM +0000, George Brown wrote:
> > > hi. diff committed, with one change: we did not add "must" (just removed
> > > "usually").
> > >
> > > jmc
> >
> > Thanks Jason. Though browsing cvsweb
> hi. diff committed, with one change: we did not add "must" (just removed
> "usually").
>
> jmc
Thanks Jason. Though browsing cvsweb it seems the commit did include the
"must" not sure if the decision changed after sending your mail or the
wrong diff got applied?
Binaries without a .note.openbsd.ident section fail to execute. This
note section is mentioned in the ELF man page as follows.
> .note This section holds information in the note section format
>described below. This section is of type SHT_NOTE. No
>attribute types ar
After pledge is immediately called without the unveil promise so this
seems redundant.
diff --git a/usr.sbin/rpki-client/main.c b/usr.sbin/rpki-client/main.c
index f05ec1c5837..53ee4223371 100644
--- a/usr.sbin/rpki-client/main.c
+++ b/usr.sbin/rpki-client/main.c
@@ -1498,8 +1498,6 @@ main(int arg
Hi Ingo,
Yes the usage of "truncate" and "chop" are unfortunate. I agree positive
language is always better.
Many thanks,
George
When viewing a file with "less -S" that has lines longer than $COLUMNS
said lines are simply not wrapped. The contents of said lines is still
available, one simply needs to scroll horizontally. I would have
expected the contents displayed within less to be as if I had run
something like "cut -c 1-$
Removes commented out pledge with whitelist, this is the only instance I
found of this grep'ing through base.
diff --git usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c
index 5caa733f4..cc1cba164 100644
--- usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c
+++ usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c
@@ -879,7 +879,6 @@ parse_args(int argc, char *
Arguably these options are fairly obvious but I was prompted by the fact
that "check" is not mentioned in the man page and this differs from the
nomenclature of "status" often used in other systems.
This is the first time I've sent a diff so I've gone for minimal change
only mentioning these in th
