On 7 Jan 2017 at 15:28, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 10:48:37AM -0500, RD Thrush wrote:
> > > On 01/06/17 06:28, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > Related to this (and particularly thinking about autoinstalls),
> > > > would it make sense to allow explicit protocols in the hostna
In some regards rdist is possibly more powerful/flexible than rsync
with its built in support for post-processing scripts. For example, I
find it extremely useful for keeping CARP firewalls in sync while
allowing for administrative changes to either.
On 7 Mar 2016 at 11:18, Michael Kennett wrot
I'm guessing that openssl was incorporated into OpenBSD base without
prior sufficient audit by the OBSD devs because it was presumed to have
better auditing / quality control upstream given its security critical
nature and function. (A number of devs have commented in the past about
the [lack o
ping? ALL feedback is welcome :-)
--- Forwarded message follows ---
From: "Jacob L. Leifman"
To: tech@openbsd.org
Date sent: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:34:55 -0500
The last(1) utility allows for an alternate data file to be specifie
The last(1) utility allows for an alternate data file to be specified
with -f switch which is particularly useful for reviewing rotated
versions of wtmp or forensic analysis.
What I found distracting (and made me briefly think it was not working)
is that regardless this specification, at the en
On 25 Mar 2012 at 10:22, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2012/03/24 21:33, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2012/03/24 16:58, Jacob L. Leifman wrote:
> > > following up on my own post (the only reponse I received was the
> > > suggestion to switch to nginx, and whi
following up on my own post (the only reponse I received was the
suggestion to switch to nginx, and while it does appear that much
development is happening there, I am not in a position to deploy
current right away...)
On 23 Mar 2012 at 18:26, Jacob L. Leifman wrote:
> In the process
In the process of migrating a simple reverse proxy from a Linux box to
OpenBSD (4.9-i386) I've come across a problem behavior that seems to
indicate that the directive ProxyPreserveHost is not working. In fact
setting it on or off does not affect the perceived behavior at all.
The setup is rath
are you a qemu image with all
> things
> > set up and the 3rd or 4th extended partition of type 0xa6, but you
> don't
> > need such hand-holding. You can do that yourself ;-)
> >
> > > Having working extended partitions would be nice, but finally
> finding
>
On 10 May 2009 at 19:14, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Hi Damien,
> >
> > > I think we should fix dd(1).
> >
> > I like that.
> >
> > Not allowing uppercase violates the principle of least surprise for "M"
> > in particular, but accepting uppercase for all four multipliers is probably
> > most conven
10 matches
Mail list logo
