On Sat, 23 Sep 2023 15:38:40 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> This makes ifnet protection consistent. Execute vmt_tclo_tick() timeout
> handler in process context to allow context switch within
> vmt_tclo_broadcastip().
ok yasuoka
> Index: sys/dev/pv/vmt.c
> =
A leak may happens when wgpeer is deleted.
ok?
The state queue should be freeed when wg_peer is destroyed.
diff from IIJ.
Index: sys/net/if_wg.c
===
RCS file: /disk/cvs/openbsd/src/sys/net/if_wg.c,v
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u
ping.
I think we have no reason not having this.
Alternatively acpiac_notify_triggered can be deleted and doing the
triggering unconditionally is also good because it's simpler.
comments? ok?
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 16:12:07 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Update the
Hi,
After 6.9 packets passed by "route-to" started to be evaluated when
output. As the result, states are created for output direction,
because it is not considered about "direct server return", has some
problems (eg. the state is deleted because the state tracking is
failed.)
relayd(8) creates
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 10:07:27 -0500
joshua stein wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 16:12:07 +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Update the AC status when the battery notification is happened.
>> Because the AC status notification doesn't happen on some machin
Let me clarify some.
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 16:12:07 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> Update the AC status when the battery notification is happened.
> Because the AC status notification doesn't happen on some machines.
At that time (plugging or unpluggin the AC), a battery n
pm」を使うことができます。
>
> Battery level (percent) checking/バッテリーのレベル（パーセント）を確認するため：apm -l
> Estimated battery duration (minutes)/バッテリーが持つ予定の時間まで（分）を確認するため：apm -m
>
> On 2023年08月17日 16:12, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Update the AC status when the battery notifi
Hi,
Update the AC status when the battery notification is happened.
Because the AC status notification doesn't happen on some machines.
My vaio actually has this problem.
Also Linux is doing the same thing
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.4/drivers/acpi/ac.c#L165-L183
ok? comments?
In
Hello,
New vaio has an audio device which is not configured.
"Intel 700 Series HD Audio" rev 0x01 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 not configured
0:31:3: Intel unknown
0x: Vendor ID: 8086, Product ID: 51ca
0x0004: Command: 0006, Status: 0010
0x0008: Class: 04 Multimedia,
Hi,
I noticed that the keyboard doesn't work for RAMDISK kernel on HP DL20
Gen10. The kernel assigns wsdisplay0 for VGA and wsdisplay1 for
efifb. But actually the glass console is efieb but it doesn't have
any keyboard assigned because the keyboard is assigned to wsdisplay0.
GENERIC kernel does
On Sat, 08 Jul 2023 21:58:30 +0300 (EEST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> The diff makes the mbstat be the same size which is actually used.
> Also revert the previous that the mbstat is located on the stack.
The userland program also needed to be changed.
ok?
Index: sys/kern/kern_sy
Hi,
The diff makes the mbstat be the same size which is actually used.
Also revert the previous that the mbstat is located on the stack.
ok?
Index: sys/kern/kern_sysctl.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/kern_sysctl.c,v
retrieving re
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 11:56:42 +0200
Tobias Heider wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:53:33PM +0200, Tobias Heider wrote:
>> I am planning to restructure the APM/sleep APIs to make it easier to suspend
>> from more places like as a suspend keyboard shortcut.
>>
>> The acpiioctl handler is x86 speci
Hi,
I'd like to expand the counters in struct mbstat from u_short to u_long.
When I was debugging a mbuf leak, I saw the result of "netstat -m"
---
28647 mbufs in use:
28551 mbufs allocated to data
4 mbufs allocated to packet headers
92 mbufs allocated to socket names and
Hi,
This netstat diff is already needed to avoid compiler warnings since
it uses struct tcpcb directly.
ok?
Index: usr.bin/netstat/inet.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/netstat/inet.c,v
retrieving revision 1.177
diff -u -p -r1.177 i
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 10:43:21 +0200
Claudio Jeker wrote:
>> @@ -411,7 +412,7 @@ tcp_stats_display(unsigned long long tot
>> P(tcpi, rcv_up, "%u")
>> P(tcpi, rcv_wscale, "%hhu")
>> P(tcpi, rfbuf_cnt, "%u")
>> -P(tcpi,
Hi,
Does using 64 bit for timer in tcpcb require this?
ok?
Index: sys/netinet/tcp.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet/tcp.h,v
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -p -r1.24 tcp.h
--- sys/netinet/tcp.h 19 May 2023 01:04:39 -
On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 12:14:47 +0300
Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> After changing tcp now tick to milliseconds, it will wrap around
> after 49 days of uptime. That may be a problem in some places of
> our stack. Better use a 64 bit counter.
I agree since we sometimes hit a problem from where we could n
Hi,
asr_run.3 is explaining that ar_rrsetinfo must be freed only for the
blocking function, but I think it must be freed regardless of the
function blocking type.
ok?
Index: lib/libc/asr/asr_run.3
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/asr
Hello,
On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 16:32:28 +0900
Yuichiro NAITO wrote:
> These 2 revisions of 'attr_val' and 'attr_thr' are different on this
> disk.
> The comment says that it's wrong vendor implementation but I can see
> 'smartctl' shows the attributes as follows. NetBSD's atactl doesn't
> see these 2
Hi,
carpdemote is increased/decreased when the link state of the carpdev
is down/up. This behavior is not related to net.inet.carp.preempt since
"carpdemote" is introduced.
But the faq still says the "net.inet.carp.preempt" variable enables it.
I'd like to commit the diff.
ok or any comment i
Hi,
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 21:32:29 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 09:00:13PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> But I think we should keep the part since it is needed when adding a
>> tunneling protocol which is not supported by pi
I'm sorry for sending 2 mails. First one was a draft. Please read second one.
Hi
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 11:30:43 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 01:40:19PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 14:35:05 +0300
>> Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>> > While switchind pppx(4) and pppac(4) from s
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 11:30:43 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 01:40:19PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 14:35:05 +0300
>> Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>> > While switchind pppx(4) and pppac(4) from selwake
Hi,
On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 14:35:05 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> While switchind pppx(4) and pppac(4) from selwakeup() to KNOTE(9), I
> found npppd(8) doesn't create pppx interface with "pipex no" in
> npppd.conf, but successfully connects the client. So packets don't flow.
> However, the pppac(
Hi,
On Wed, 04 Jan 2023 21:52:35 +0100
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Dear Sergii and others,
>
> I've committed the change that passes the ESRT from the bootloader to
> the kernel. So now it is time to add the interfaces to the kernel to
> read it. And add the interfaces to manipulate EFI variables.
ok yasuoka
On Fri, 06 Jan 2023 15:14:05 +0900 (JST)
Masato Asou wrote:
> I have updated my patch.
>
> From: YASUOKA Masahiko
> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 11:58:34 +0900 (JST)
>
>> After diff, it doesn't use PAGE_SIZE any more. And VMware software
>> limi
Hi,
Sorry for separating emails.
On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 11:58:34 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> @@ -1115,12 +1116,19 @@ xs_kvop(void *xsc, int op, char *key, char *value,
>> size_t valuelen)
>> }
>> /* FALLTHROUGH */
>> case X
Hi,
On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 13:37:45 +0900 (JST)
Masato Asou wrote:
> My new patch is not returned value length from ioctl() system call
> when read the KEY's value.
>
> The hostctl command allocate 4k bytes memory for store the value. Then
> read the value by ioctl() system call. If ioctl() returne
Yes, my previous commit was wrong. Calling vm_rpc_close() was missing.
Thank you for finding.
ok yasuoka
On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 19:26:05 +0900 (JST)
Masato Asou wrote:
> From: Masato Asou
> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 18:26:22 +0900 (JST)
>
> Delete #define VMT_DEBUG
> ok?
> --
> ASOU Masato
>
>> co
This is obvious. M_ZERO must be for 3rd argument.
ok?
Index: sys/dev/pv/pvbus.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pv/pvbus.c,v
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -p -r1.25 pvbus.c
--- sys/dev/pv/pvbus.c 25 Aug 2022 17:38:16 - 1
It doesn't seem to have a problem. Sorry for my delay.
ok yasuoka
On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 13:24:21 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> ping...
>
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 03:16:02PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>> Push netlock down to pppx_add_session(). The 'pppx_if' structure has
>> the `pxi_read
On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 14:41:18 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:58:20 +0900 (JST)
> YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> On Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:37:35 +0900 (JST)
>> Masato Asou wrote:
>>> From: "Theo de Raadt"
>>> Date: Tue, 04 Oct
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:58:20 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:37:35 +0900 (JST)
> Masato Asou wrote:
>> From: "Theo de Raadt"
>> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 21:58:13 -0600
>>> Userland may not ask the kernel to allocate such a huge obj
Hello,
On Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:37:35 +0900 (JST)
Masato Asou wrote:
> From: "Theo de Raadt"
> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 21:58:13 -0600
>> Userland may not ask the kernel to allocate such a huge object. The
>> kernel address space is quite small. First off, huge allocations will
>> fail.
>>
>> But
Hello,
My colleague hit the following kernel panic when he is doing "psctl
-ss" repeatedly by a script during a performance test.
uvm_fault(0xfd811b869110, 0x10, 0, 1) -> e
kernel: page fault trap, code=0
Stopped at pf_state_export+0x42: movq0x10(%rax),%rcx
TIDPIDUI
ok yasuoka
On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 14:44:29 +0200
Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> + now = READ_ONCE(tcp_now);
> +
> /*
>* Determine length of data that should be transmitted,
>* and flags that will be used.
> @@ -228,7 +231,7 @@ tcp_output(struct tcpcb *tp)
>* to send, then
Hi,
On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 17:40:13 +0200
Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 03:04:34PM +0200, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> The diff is to fix a problem in a complex setup.
>>
>> Normal setup of divert-reply for TCP connection:
>>
>>
Hi,
The diff is to fix a problem in a complex setup.
Normal setup of divert-reply for TCP connection:
client --- relayd --- server
- transparently forward TCP connections
- divert-reply is configured the outbound connection to the server
- so that the PF state is removed when the PCB is de
Hello,
For HTTP request body, if neither "Content-Encoding: chunked" nor
"Content-Length" is specified, it should mean body length is 0.
In RFC 9112 Section 6.3, 7.:
| 7. If this is a request message and none of the above are true, then
| the message body length is zero (no message body
Hi,
Tested.
ok yasuoka
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:41:29 +0200
Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I looks like syzkaller has found a missing input validation in pipex.
>
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=c7ac769bd7ee15549b8a2be188bcee07d98a5357
>
> As I have no pipex setup, can anyone test thi
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 14:09:40 +0200
Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 01:01:47PM +0200, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:56:53 +0200
>> Claudio Jeker wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 11:18:01AM +0200, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> >
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:56:53 +0200
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 11:18:01AM +0200, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> @@ -423,11 +423,13 @@ uu_decode(void)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +#define ROUNDDOWN(x,y) (((x)/(y)) * (y))
>> +
>> static
b64decode(8) fails if a long line is given.
% wc test
1 11370 test
%
% ./b64decode -r test > /dev/null
b64decode: test: /dev/stdout: error decoding base64 input stream
%
uudecode.c
426 static int
427 base64_decode(void)
428 {
429 int n;
430
ok yasuoka
On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 13:50:37 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> pipex(4) doesn't rely on netlock anymore.
>
> Index: sys/net/if_pppx.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_pppx.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.119
> diff -u -p
ok yasuoka
On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 12:31:47 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> We don't use "static" keyword for functions declaration to allow ddb(4)
> debug. Also, many "Static" functions are called by pppx(4) layer outside
> pipex(4) layer.
>
> This is the mostly mechanic diff, except the `pipex_pp
Hello,
Let me ask "ok",
The diff fixes the problem as follows:
Configure wg0 without wgrtable
# ifconfig wg0 create wgport 7111 wgkey `openssl rand -base64 32` up
# ifconfig wg0
wg0: flags=80c3 mtu 1420
index 6 priority 0 llprio 3
Hello,
On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 14:09:52 +0900 (JST)
Masato Asou wrote:
> The TUNNEL in the man ifconfig(8) is described as follows:
>
> TUNNEL
>
> tunneldomain rtable
> ^^here
> Use routing table rtable instead of the default table. The
>
ok yasuoka
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 01:11:22 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> Long time ago pipex(4) session can't be deleted until both pipex(4)
> input and output queues become empty. Dead sessions were linked to the
> stack and the `ip_forward' flag was used to prevent packets forwarding.
> npppd(8
ok yasuoka
On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 18:04:04 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 10:46:56PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 01:43:41 +0300
>> Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 12:08
Hello,
On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 01:43:41 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 12:08:49AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>> Thanks for pointing.
>>
>> > On 8 Jul 2022, at 23:13, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 05:42:23PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>>
Hello,
On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 00:53:16 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> The `pipex_list_mtx' mutex(9) protects global pipex(4) lists so it need
> to be taken while we perform this foreach loop.
>
> The all sessions loop was reworked to make possible to drop the lock
> within. This is required becaus
On Thu, 07 Jul 2022 14:02:35 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> Hello Scott,
>
> With the patch, my machine on ESXi it doesn't show any extra message.
>
> *Without* the patch, the machine shows
>
> % grep 'TSC.*skew' dmesg.current-tsc-debug
> cpu1:
Hello Scott,
With the patch, my machine on ESXi it doesn't show any extra message.
*Without* the patch, the machine shows
% grep 'TSC.*skew' dmesg.current-tsc-debug
cpu1: disabling user TSC (skew=-2603)
cpu2: disabling user TSC (skew=-2959)
cpu3: disabling user TSC (skew=-3784)
%
and mono
ok yasuoka
On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 12:26:55 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> yasuoka@ remonded me, long time ago pipex(4) sessions can't be deleted
> until both input and output queues become empty:
>
> pipex_timer(void *ignored_arg)
> {
> /* ... */
> switch (session->state) {
>
On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 19:37:57 +0200 (CEST)
Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 23:49:05 +0900 (JST)
>> From: YASUOKA Masahiko
(snip)
>> @@ -444,6 +445,30 @@ efi_video_init(void)
>> int i, mode80x25, m
On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 15:52:41 +0300
Nick Henderson wrote:
> Any updates on this patch? Would love to see it included in the next release.
Yes.
I'll commit this this weekend even if I don't get no ok.
ok?
Index: sys/arch/amd64/stand/efiboot/efiboot.c
=
Hi,
On Sun, 27 Mar 2022 18:25:18 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 15:28:44 +0900
> Yuichiro NAITO wrote:
>> I see 'Address already in use' message,
>> when I change wgrtable for a running wg interface.
>> It doesn't make sense to
Hello,
The below diff originally posted by Alexei K. on bugs@:
Garbled screen when booting with UEFI
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=165087969227708&w=2
The same problem had been reported periodically and we have asked to
use "machine gop" to workaround it. But the diff from Alexei se
on table 1 fails with
EADDRINUSE when 7111/udp on rtable 0 is used.
> On 3/28/22 15:59, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 15:20:02 +0900
>> Yuichiro NAITO wrote:
>>> Thanks for the explanation.
>>> I understand how your patch works.
>>>
>
is nothing to do, since the command is to bind the same
port, protocol, and domain of prevous.
The code seems to do such the skip already, but it lacks consideration
for rtable_l2(rtable) != rtable case.
> On 3/28/22 14:01, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 12:12:39
Hi,
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 12:12:39 +0900
Yuichiro NAITO wrote:
> On 3/27/22 18:25, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 15:28:44 +0900
>> Yuichiro NAITO wrote:
>>> I see 'Address already in use' message,
>>> when I change wgrtabl
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 15:28:44 +0900
Yuichiro NAITO wrote:
> I see 'Address already in use' message,
> when I change wgrtable for a running wg interface.
> It doesn't make sense to me.
>
> It can be reproduced by the following command sequence.
>
> ```
> # route -T1 add default `cat /etc/mygat
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Dec 2021 21:50:47 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 12:50:23PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 04:16:28PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> > > - npppd l2pt ipsecflowinfo is not MP safe
>> >
>>
Hello,
On Fri, 24 Dec 2021 00:55:04 +0100
Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 08:35:45PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>> Note that IPsec still has the workaround to disable multiple queues.
>
> I think we can remove the ipsec_in_use workaround now. The IPsec
> path is protected wi
Hi,
On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 13:20:46 +0100
Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 06:25:20PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Yes, if there is another better idea, it will be welcome.
>> For this moment, the diff is the best idea for me.
>
> Sorry, no better idea.
Hi,
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 01:20:49 +0100
Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> I don't know much about l2tp, pipex or npppd. So I cannot say if
> the new logic is correct. But I guess you have tested that.
Yes, I've tested some L2TP/IPsec cases already.
> The tdb mutex and ref counting looks correct.
>
>>
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 00:27:06 +0100
Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 05:53:34PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This question is mostly for bluhm@. Should the gettdbbyflow() grab the
>> extra reference on returned `tdbp' like other other gettdb*() do? I'm
>> pointing th
Hi,
Let me update the diff. Previous has a problem in ipsp_spd_lookup()
which uses "rn" without initialization.
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 21:44:20 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> On Wed, 12 May 2021 19:11:09 +0900 (JST)
> YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Radek reported a
Hi,
On Wed, 12 May 2021 19:11:09 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> Radek reported a problem to misc@ that multiple Windows clients behind
> a NAT cannot use a L2TP/IPsec server simultaneously.
>
> https://marc.info/?t=16099681611&r=1&w=2
>
> There is two p
Hi,
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 07:03:43 +
Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 12:02:07PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> I'd like to clarify "aes" in ipsec.conf accepts 128:256 bits.
>>
>> sbin/ipsecctl/ike.c:
>> 201
ok?
Clarify that ANY can be used for several parameters of IPsec transform.
Index: sbin/isakmpd/isakmpd.conf.5
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/isakmpd/isakmpd.conf.5,v
retrieving revision 1.135
diff -u -p -r1.135 isakmpd.conf.5
--- sbin/
I'd like to clarify "aes" in ipsec.conf accepts 128:256 bits.
sbin/ipsecctl/ike.c:
201 case ENCXF_AES:
202 enc_alg = "AES";
203 key_length = "128,128:256";
204 br
Hi,
# drop ccing misc@
The diff seems ok for me.
ok to commit it in?
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 10:42:04 +0900
Yuichiro NAITO wrote:
> Following patch changes pkg_add to return a error code,
> if a package name is wrong.
>
> diff --git a/usr.sbin/pkg_add/OpenBSD/AddDelete.pm
> b/usr.sbin/pkg_add/Ope
On Wed, 12 May 2021 19:11:09 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> Radek reported a problem to misc@ that multiple Windows clients behind
> a NAT cannot use a L2TP/IPsec server simultaneously.
>
> https://marc.info/?t=16099681611&r=1&w=2
>
> There is two problems.
On Wed, 12 May 2021 19:15:29 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>> On 12 May 2021, at 18:42, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 May 2021 17:26:51 +0300
>> Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 07:11:09PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>>>>
On Wed, 12 May 2021 17:26:51 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 07:11:09PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Radek reported a problem to misc@ that multiple Windows clients behind a NAT
>> cannot use a L2TP/IPsec server simultaneously.
>>
&g
Hi,
Radek reported a problem to misc@ that multiple Windows clients
behind a NAT cannot use a L2TP/IPsec server simultaneously.
https://marc.info/?t=16099681611&r=1&w=2
There is two problems. First is pipex(4) doesn't pass the proper
ipsecflowinfo to ip_output(). Second is the IPsec po
pr 2021 09:21:40 +0200
Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 07:14:49PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> > Another issue that I see is that people have not reported, at least
> [...]
>> > publicly, that this runs fine on their normal OpenBSD
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:24:03 +0200 (CEST)
Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 19:14:49 +0900 (JST)
>> From: YASUOKA Masahiko
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 10:43:00 +0300
>> Paul Irofti wrote:
>> > On 05.04.2021 06:13, Scott
Hi,
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 10:43:00 +0300
Paul Irofti wrote:
> On 05.04.2021 06:13, Scott Cheloha wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 02:00:01PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>>> On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 19:41:35 +0100 (CET)
>>> Mark Kettenis wrote:
>>>>> From: S
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 19:41:35 +0100 (CET)
Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Scott Cheloha
>> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 13:18:04 -0500
>> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 05:40:21PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Which diff did you apply? Yasuoka provided two diffs.
>>
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:12:44 +0100 (CET)
Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:43:23 +0900 (JST)
>> From: YASUOKA Masahiko
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:30:43 +0100
>> Jan Klemkow wrote:
>> > If you want to boot O
Hi,
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:30:43 +0100
Jan Klemkow wrote:
> If you want to boot OpenBSD on an HP EliteBook 830 G7/G8, the bootloader
> will hang while loading the kernel. Because, the UEFI loads the
> bootloader on the same place in memory, where the bootloader will copy
> the kernel. We are un
like 900, 900, 900, 900, 0, 900, 900, 900 you pick 0 which could lead
> to some problems, right? Or am I missing something?"
>
> So could people give the minimum skew approach a spin on real machines
> to see if there are any issues popping up?
>
> All the best,
> Paul
>
Hi,
I hit a problem which is caused by going back of monotonic time. It
happens on hosts on VMware ESXi.
I wrote the program which repeats the problem.
% cc -o monotime monotime.c -lpthread
% ./monotime
194964 Starting
562210 Starting
483046 Starting
148865 Starting
148865 Back 991.80804
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:15:58 +0100 (CET)
Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 20:35:41 +0900 (JST)
>> YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> > efiboot cannot load the kernel properly on some machines if booted
>> > from CD-ROM. In that case boot fa
versed..
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 20:35:41 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> efiboot cannot load the kernel properly on some machines if booted
> from CD-ROM. In that case boot fails with a message like follow:
>
>booting cd0a:. [359648read symbols: Unknown error: code 255
>
Hi,
efiboot cannot load the kernel properly on some machines if booted
from CD-ROM. In that case boot fails with a message like follow:
booting cd0a:. [359648read symbols: Unknown error: code 255
As far as Asou and my test, this happens on hosts on VMware ESXi 6.7,
7.0 and asou's physica
Hi,
Let me update "diff #2".
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:42:32 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> My vaio repeatedly crashed by "Data modified on freelist"(*1) or other
> memory corruptions. After my long time debug, I found the route cause
> is a handling of r
Hi,
My vaio repeatedly crashed by "Data modified on freelist"(*1) or other
memory corruptions. After my long time debug, I found the route cause
is a handling of references of LocalX, like the following:
If ((SMRW (0x0B, 0x16, 0x21, RefOf (Local0)) == Zero))
In the called co
ok yasuoka
Thanks,
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 12:06:08 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> `sc_dead' is used to prevent pppac_ioctl() be called on dying pppac(4)
> interface. But now if_detach() makes dying `ifp' inaccessible and waits
> for references which are in-use. This logic is not required anymore.
Yes,
ok yasuoka
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:32:39 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> Since OpenBSD 6.7 npppd(8) can't work over tun(4) anymore. I propose to
> remove dummy TUNSIFMODE ioctl(2) call.
>
> Index: sys/net/if_pppx.c
> ===
> RCS
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 08:54:36 +0900
Yuichiro NAITO wrote:
> Does anybody please review my code?
>
> Yasuoka-san is my coleague of my work.
> So, he is interested in this topic. That’s why I CCed this mail.
> I don’t mean he is an reviewer.
>
>> 2021/01/12 11:27、Yuichiro NAITO のメール:
>> I have
Yes,
ok yasuoka
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 03:02:55 +0300
Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> This time pipex(4) related ioctl(2) calls PIPEX{S,G}MODE are pretty
> dummy and were kept for backward compatibility reasons. The diff below
> removes them.
>
> ok?
>
> Index: share/man/man4/pipex.4
> ==
the condition was reversed.
ok?
Index: parse.y
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/pfctl/parse.y,v
retrieving revision 1.702
diff -u -p -r1.702 parse.y
--- parse.y 17 Sep 2020 10:09:43 - 1.702
+++ parse.y 17 Sep 2020 14:23:42
Hi,
I just committed yours.
Thanks,
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:07:40 +0200
Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 07:49:19PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> New diff is using -1 for ENOENT.
>>
>> Also domainid == 0 is a valid domain id, but previous diff cannot
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 12:04:55 +0200
Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Using the function verb would reads a bit clearer/more intuitive,
> i.e.
Yes, "if (!rtable_exists($2))" seems better.
>> @@ -5887,17 +5897,37 @@ rdomain_exists(u_int rdomain)
>>
>> len = sizeof(info);
>> if (sysctl(mib, 6
Hi,
So, it seems we need to more code and test for pf(4) part.
Let me continue this separetely.
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:07:53 +0200
Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 02:09:27PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Make pfctl check if the rtable really exists when parsing t
1 - 100 of 341 matches
Mail list logo
