Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Alexander Nasonov wrote:
>
> > Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > > Looking at our code in lib/libc/stdlib/drand48.c, i conclude that
> > > drand48(3) does return 0.0 with a probability of 2^-48.
> >
> > I looked at the code too and I hav
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Looking at our code in lib/libc/stdlib/drand48.c, i conclude that
> drand48(3) does return 0.0 with a probability of 2^-48.
I looked at the code too and I have some comments.
> More generally, the function returns a uniform distribution of
> numbers from the set {2^-48 * n
j...@bitminer.ca wrote:
>
> Clarify that drand48 returns values not including 1.0.
It's not clear from the documentation whether drand48 can generate
a denormal number. If it can't, you can exclude 0.0 because it's
a denormal ;-)
--
Alex
Theo de Raadt wrote:
> The following change only permits system calls from address-ranges
> in the process which system calls are expected from.
Just curious if some approximation of pledge can be reimplemented
in userspace with more granular libc.so's text segments?
--
Alex
Eichert, Diana wrote:
> I wrote a vax BPF jit as a simple exercize some time ago, so all
> you really need now is to implement vax-to-${ARCH} jit on an MD
> basis. This should be very easy to do as long as BPF does not get
> extended to use floating-point values.
I'm afraid you have to rewrite it
