Re: make -j and errors

2012-09-26 Thread Darrin Chandler
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 06:21:34PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: > "but what about commands that take a long time to run ?" > Well, make already has a standard mechanism to flag those, that's called > .PRECIOUS What if most everything takes a fairly long time to run? Say, largish C++ sources or whateve

Re: random() always returns 0 with srandom(0)

2012-03-21 Thread Darrin Chandler
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:37:47PM -0500, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > My co-worker was troubleshooting why some of our unittests (that work on > multiple operating systems and architectures) failed on OpenBSD and saw > that if you call srandom(0) to initialize the RNG, random() will always > return

Re: Help with Port(s)?

2011-10-27 Thread Darrin Chandler
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 03:10:54PM -0400, cody chandler wrote: > I'm interested in helping with port(s). I'm new and have a lot to learn > but if someone would not mind teaching I'd like to help! See http://www.openbsd.org/faq/ports/index.html for starters. -- http://code.phxbsd.com/

Re: better cpu throttling

2010-07-01 Thread Darrin Chandler
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 07:59:00PM -0600, Tobias Weingartner wrote: > On Wednesday, June 30, Darrin Chandler wrote: > > > > What you're saying is true, but that's not the only use case. Streaming > > media may not benefit from 100% cpu but may not be able to work pr

Re: better cpu throttling

2010-06-30 Thread Darrin Chandler
won't make what you're doing finish faster and running at 0% won't work. -- Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG dwchand...@stilyagin.com | http://phxbug.org/ | http://metabug.org/ http://www.stilyagin.com/ | Daemons in the Desert | Global BUG Federation

Re: better cpu throttling

2010-06-30 Thread Darrin Chandler
at 100% or cpu at 30%. > But this is not the final diff. It will probably have some means of > control eventually, until then, it'd be nice if people evaluated if > this meets their needs. :) -- Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG dwchand...@stilyagi

Re: UBC?

2010-02-02 Thread Darrin Chandler
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 06:36:14PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:09:58AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 02:51:52AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote: > > > are you talking about Bret's reply about buzzwords? imo, that's wha

Re: UBC?

2010-02-02 Thread Darrin Chandler
ve a pretty thick skin and have been around on the lists enough to see how things work. So why did this thread bother me? Because there's a difference between some idiot asking idiotic questions on misc@ and getting blasted, and an inquiry into a pretty common, genuine issue on t...@. -- D

Re: UBC?

2010-02-01 Thread Darrin Chandler
de of the bulk of the thread. While this thread was relatively mild compared to some I think Allen has a point. There's just no need to escalate what should have been a purely technical discussion into an ad hominem attack. -- Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG dwchand...@stilyagin.com | http://phxbug.org/ | http://metabug.org/ http://www.stilyagin.com/ | Daemons in the Desert | Global BUG Federation

Re: Make remote debugging with KGDB possible

2009-12-15 Thread Darrin Chandler
http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca > STUN/TURN server--> http://numb.viagenie.ca > vCard 4.0 --> http://www.vcarddav.org > -- Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG dwchand...@stilyagin.com | http://phxbug.org/ | http://metabug.org/ http://www.stilyagin.com/ | Daemons in the Desert | Global BUG Federation

Re: kernel hacking

2009-12-10 Thread Darrin Chandler
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:55:53PM -0500, Bryan Allen wrote: > +-- > | On 2009-12-10 10:47:06, Darrin Chandler wrote: > | > | > /usr/src/sys/nfs > | > /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs.* > | > a bottle of

Re: kernel hacking

2009-12-10 Thread Darrin Chandler
lube > and a teacup to collect your tears. nfs? ditch the teacup and get a funnel, because the tears will easily fill the empty wine bottle. -- Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG dwchand...@stilyagin.com | http://phxbug.org/ | http://metabug.org/ http://www.stilyagin.com/ | Daemons in the Desert | Global BUG Federation

Re: too many cpus

2009-12-07 Thread Darrin Chandler
'1' will save me minor amounts of muscle memory induced grief when bouncing around different systems. -- Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG dwchand...@stilyagin.com | http://phxbug.org/ | http://metabug.org/ http://www.stilyagin.com/ | Daemons in the Desert | Global BUG Federation

Re: ksh vi mode werase (^W) handling

2009-06-09 Thread Darrin Chandler
The problem was just as you desribed. Below is a diff to restore 'B' and do the right thing on ^W. Thanks! --- /usr/src/bin/ksh/vi.c Tue Jun 9 10:32:27 2009 +++ vi.cTue Jun 9 10:38:15 2009 @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ vi_insert(int ch) } if (ch == edchars.werase) {

Re: ksh vi mode werase (^W) handling

2009-06-09 Thread Darrin Chandler
character is not working anymore; it > acts like if you pressed the lower case 'b', so it won't jump back to > characters, only to '/' characters. > > Is this the intended functioning? (I hope not :( ) Hmm. It's not doing that for me. Both 'b' an

Re: ksh vi mode werase (^W) handling

2009-06-09 Thread Darrin Chandler
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 06:49:06AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote: > Hmm. It's not doing that for me. Both 'b' and 'B' seem to be working, > with 'b' using '/' and other punctuation, and 'B' only caring about ' '. > Can y

ksh vi mode werase (^W) handling

2009-06-03 Thread Darrin Chandler
Hi, Here's a diff to make ksh vi mode handle werase more like vi. It's really irritating to have whole paths go away on ^W instead of just the last bit. --- /usr/src/bin/ksh/vi.c Mon Apr 10 07:38:59 2006 +++ vi.cWed Jun 3 16:54:07 2009 @@ -416,9 +416,9 @@ vi_hook(int ch)