So it does. Not sure how I missed that, but I did. Oh well. Thanks :-/
John
On 1 October 2016 at 14:31, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 01:38:49PM +1000, john slee wrote:
> > Not sure if folks are interested in this or not, but it sure caused me
> some
> > angst
Not sure if folks are interested in this or not, but it sure caused me some
angst this morning. OSX has the same behaviour and also doesn't document
it. I assume it has been that way for a long, long time.
My first patch. Thanks for all the cool stuff :-)
Index: bin/test/test.1
==
On 30 November 2013 21:59, Lars Nooden wrote:
> perlre(1) seems to be missing information about substitution evaluations
> with the /e option. The functionality is present in perl:
>
It is, however, already documented in perlop(1)
John
On 1 September 2011 10:21, Uwe Stuehler wrote:
> If -k would become free for other uses, just for consideration:
> - in FreeBSD and Solaris, -k is unused
> - in NetBSD, -k specifies the sort order
> - in Linux' procps, "k" specifies the sort order
-k in AIX /usr/bin/ps is documented as "Lists ker
On 18 July 2011 04:28, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> can i ask why you want to support this? it is a gnu grep thing or
> something?
It isn't. I looked on AIX, Tru64, SCO and Solaris. The OS-provided vi
supported this syntax on all four systems, and on Solaris, /usr/bin/grep
supported it as well. The
