Hi Martijn,
On 06/22/17 21:32, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Attached a patch to remove the binc function from vi
> and replace it with recallocarray.
In principle, the memory handling in vi is very ugly, and getting it
into a more standard form seems desirable - but likely to cause quite
some
No one?
On 07/02/17 19:58, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Any takers?
>
> On 06/22/17 21:32, Martijn van Duren wrote:
>> Hello tech@,
>>
>> Attached a patch to remove the binc function from vi and replace it with
>> recallocarray. The functions effectively do the same thing since
>> BINC_{GOTO,RET}
Any takers?
On 06/22/17 21:32, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Hello tech@,
>
> Attached a patch to remove the binc function from vi and replace it with
> recallocarray. The functions effectively do the same thing since
> BINC_{GOTO,RET} already do the nlen > llen comparison. I've run
> this without
Hello tech@,
Attached a patch to remove the binc function from vi and replace it with
recallocarray. The functions effectively do the same thing since
BINC_{GOTO,RET} already do the nlen > llen comparison. I've run
this without any issues, but since recallocarray does extra checks and
binc ALWAYS
