On 02/09/13(Mon) 07:54, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:43:51PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Diff below is just a small refactoring of two similar code chunks to
> > inform user processes that something changed regarding a route.
> >
> > I'd like to get this in becaus
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:43:51PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below is just a small refactoring of two similar code chunks to
> inform user processes that something changed regarding a route.
>
> I'd like to get this in because it removes one use of rt_addrinfo in
> netinet6.
>
> There'
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:43:51PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below is just a small refactoring of two similar code chunks to
> inform user processes that something changed regarding a route.
>
> I'd like to get this in because it removes one use of rt_addrinfo in
> netinet6.
>
> There'
On 02/09/13(Mon) 07:54, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:43:51PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Diff below is just a small refactoring of two similar code chunks to
> > inform user processes that something changed regarding a route.
> >
> > I'd like to get this in becaus
Diff below is just a small refactoring of two similar code chunks to
inform user processes that something changed regarding a route.
I'd like to get this in because it removes one use of rt_addrinfo in
netinet6.
There's no functional change, ok?
Index: net/route.c
===