Hi Stuart et al.,
Sorry for the delay. Meanwhile, I've been reproducing the
issue on 6.3 by adding device rd and increasing MINIROOTSIZE
to grow the non-gdb amd64 kernel beyond 16 MB. The kernel
simply fails to boot.
> If the kernel should grow to a point where we run past some limit, we'll fix
On 2018/03/12 17:50, Franco Fichtner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With regard to a commit[1] by Theo in 2013, several questions
> in the years before and a partial lift of the limitation on
> i386 a while back (2015?) I'd like to ask what the future plans
> are for OpenBSD.
>
> Peeking at NetBSD, where the a
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 04:15:23PM +0100, Franco Fichtner wrote:
>
> > On 13. Mar 2018, at 4:04 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> >
> > Franco Fichtner wrote:
> >> What can we do to help?
> >
> > Write smaller code...
>
> Fair enough. ;)
>
> On a more serious note, I'm referring to:
>
> https://marc
> On 13. Mar 2018, at 4:04 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> Franco Fichtner wrote:
>> What can we do to help?
>
> Write smaller code...
Fair enough. ;)
On a more serious note, I'm referring to:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=112152576800634&w=2
"Immediate reboots" is what can still be repro
Franco Fichtner wrote:
> What can we do to help?
Write smaller code...
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 05:50:42PM +0100, Franco Fichtner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With regard to a commit[1] by Theo in 2013, several questions
> in the years before and a partial lift of the limitation on
> i386 a while back (2015?) I'd like to ask what the future plans
> are for OpenBSD.
>
> Peeking a
Hi,
With regard to a commit[1] by Theo in 2013, several questions
in the years before and a partial lift of the limitation on
i386 a while back (2015?) I'd like to ask what the future plans
are for OpenBSD.
Peeking at NetBSD, where the amd64 was bootstrapped, they are at
48 MB kernel size at the
