hope this time i get the part ‘poke claudio@’ right
a. fix a bug.
b. get rid of some junk in ‘mask_rnhead’.
c. forbid unprivileged user to insert ‘genmask' into ‘mask_rnhead'
bug is in this line
memcmp((caddr_t *)info.rti_info[RTAX_GENMASK] + 1, (caddr_t *)t-rn_key
+ 1, ((struct
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 06:29:57AM +0800, Kieran Devlin wrote:
hope this time i get the part ?poke claudio@? right
a. fix a bug.
b. get rid of some junk in ?mask_rnhead?.
c. forbid unprivileged user to insert ?genmask' into ?mask_rnhead'
bug is in this line
memcmp((caddr_t
IIRC, I'd talked to both claudio and sthen about removing genmask,
as it's unused and slightly nonsensical. Maybe we should just do
it, if there are actual bugs lurking therein?
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 03:57:04AM +0800, Kieran Devlin wrote:
re-send this patch, loop in claudio@
maybe someone
maybe, one problem at a time?
first, whether there is actually a bug there, this patch fix it?
and then this removing genmask discussion
as i understand, unless you guys had already reached a conclusion once, there
might be no immediate result
and as blambert@ mentioned, whether it is really a
maybe someone could verify commit this patch
a. fix a bug
b. get rid of junk in ‘mask_rnhead'
c. forbid unprivileged user to insert mask into ‘mask_rnhead'
bug is in this line
Bcmp((caddr_t *)genmask + 1, (caddr_t *)t-rn_key + 1, ((struct
sockaddr *)t-rn_key)-sa_len)
to make this
re-send this patch, loop in claudio@
maybe someone could verify commit this patch
a. fix a bug
b. get rid of junk in ‘mask_rnhead'
c. forbid unprivileged user to insert mask into ‘mask_rnhead'
bug is in this line
Bcmp((caddr_t *)genmask + 1, (caddr_t *)t-rn_key + 1, ((struct
sockaddr