Hi,
I've applied the patch on 6.2 and it fixes the problem.
# pfctl -ef /etc/pf.conf
pf enabled
# pfctl -a /uno/due -t foo -T show
10.0.0.1
# pfctl
Hello Leo,
this looks like my bad, which goes back to commit [1], which tried to fix 'mix
up of anchor names and anchor paths'. I've completely forgot to take care of
pfctl/parse.y back then. Please let me know if patch below solves your problem.
thank you for great troubleshooting and excellent
If I change the load statement in pf.uno using
the full path ( /uno/due instead of due ); thens
there is no error; but still no table is loaded.
/etc/pf.conf:
###
block log
anchor "uno"
load anchor "uno" from "/etc/pf.uno"
###
/etc/pf.uno
Hi,
there is a confusing error message in 6.1 and 6.2
(not in 6.0) when using a table inside a nested anchor.
here the rules:
/etc/pf.conf:
###
block log
anchor "uno"
load anchor "uno" from "/etc/pf.uno"
###
/etc/pf.uno
