Re: devel/cvsweb: README (patch)
w...@disroot.org: > after locate(1)'ing and adding those files i could happily run cvsweb on > openbsd 6.5-release > > i'm sending patch for README (2 lines) as suggested by \renaud on #openbsd > (freenode) Thanks, but this was already fixed in -current seven weeks ago. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
devel/cvsweb: README (patch)
hello, after installing devel/cvsweb, doing `sh README`, and modifying cvsweb and cvsweb.conf files: i got 500 internal server error doing chroot /var/www /cgi-bin/cvsweb i noticed from the output that some files were missing: Can't locate parent.pm in @INC (you may need to install the parent module) (@INC contains: /usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl/amd64-openbsd /usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl /usr/libdata/perl5/amd64-openbsd /usr/libdata/perl5) at /usr/libdata/perl5/Time/Local.pm line 10. Can't locate loadable object for module Cwd in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl/amd64-openbsd /usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl /usr/libdata/perl5/amd64-openbsd /usr/libdata/perl5) at /cgi-bin/cvsweb line 1831 after locate(1)'ing and adding those files i could happily run cvsweb on openbsd 6.5-release i'm sending patch for README (2 lines) as suggested by \renaud on #openbsd (freenode) references: readme: http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/devel/cvsweb/pkg/README?rev=1.18&content-type=text/x- thank you for the attention README.cvsweb.patch Description: Binary data
Re: README patch
Hi, Andras Farkas wrote on Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 06:21:26PM -0500: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Sebastian Benoit wrote: >> http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.2/README > Much more minor, It is now known that that file is outdated in a number of respects. However, it is not subject to version control, and consequently normal developers cannot change it, so please be patient. There is no need to report additional errors in that file. I expect that it will get updated for the next release at the latest. Yours, Ingo
Re: README patch
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Sebastian Benoit wrote: > http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.2/README Much more minor, but "This is our 43nd release." should be "This is our 43rd release." Also, "For further details, please visit https://OpenBSD.org/faq"; actually ends up being https://www.openbsd.org/faq/ with a slash at the very end.
Re: README patch
Jason McIntyre(j...@kerhand.co.uk) on 2017.11.09 19:45:53 +: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 08:42:32PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Jason McIntyre wrote on Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 07:26:32PM +: > > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:14:24PM -0600, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > > > > >> --- README.orig 2017-11-08 20:11:47.091955000 -0600 > > >> +++ README 2017-11-08 20:12:19.787639000 -0600 > > >> @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ > > >> > > >> No major funding or cost-sharing of the project comes from any company > > >> or educational institution. Theo works full-time on improving OpenBSD > > >> -and paying bills, many other developers expend spend significant > > >> -quantities of time as well. > > >> +and paying bills, many other developers spend significant quantities > > >> +of time as well. > > >> > > >> For those unable to make their contributions as straightforward gifts, > > >> the OpenBSD Foundation (http://OpenBSDFoundation.org) is a Canadian > > >> > > >> > > >> Or perhaps it should be expend instead. Not sure, but both sound weird. > > > > > both suggested fixes would be fine. > > > > No it would not. The first sentence is no longer true, see > > > > http://www.openbsdfoundation.org/contributors.html > > > > So this would need a much larger fix. > > > > fair enough. my comment was about the grammar really, rather than the > content. > > > > however i have no idea which README this is... > > > > Indeed, i see no evidence that this old text still exists anywhere. > > At least > > > > locate README | xargs grep -F 'No major funding' > > > > turns up nothing for me. http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.2/README
Re: README patch
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 08:42:32PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Hi, > > Jason McIntyre wrote on Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 07:26:32PM +: > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:14:24PM -0600, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > > >> --- README.orig 2017-11-08 20:11:47.091955000 -0600 > >> +++ README 2017-11-08 20:12:19.787639000 -0600 > >> @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ > >> > >> No major funding or cost-sharing of the project comes from any company > >> or educational institution. Theo works full-time on improving OpenBSD > >> -and paying bills, many other developers expend spend significant > >> -quantities of time as well. > >> +and paying bills, many other developers spend significant quantities > >> +of time as well. > >> > >> For those unable to make their contributions as straightforward gifts, > >> the OpenBSD Foundation (http://OpenBSDFoundation.org) is a Canadian > >> > >> > >> Or perhaps it should be expend instead. Not sure, but both sound weird. > > > both suggested fixes would be fine. > > No it would not. The first sentence is no longer true, see > > http://www.openbsdfoundation.org/contributors.html > > So this would need a much larger fix. > fair enough. my comment was about the grammar really, rather than the content. > > however i have no idea which README this is... > > Indeed, i see no evidence that this old text still exists anywhere. > At least > > locate README | xargs grep -F 'No major funding' > > turns up nothing for me. > win win! jmc
Re: README patch
Hi, Jason McIntyre wrote on Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 07:26:32PM +: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:14:24PM -0600, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: >> --- README.orig 2017-11-08 20:11:47.091955000 -0600 >> +++ README 2017-11-08 20:12:19.787639000 -0600 >> @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ >> >> No major funding or cost-sharing of the project comes from any company >> or educational institution. Theo works full-time on improving OpenBSD >> -and paying bills, many other developers expend spend significant >> -quantities of time as well. >> +and paying bills, many other developers spend significant quantities >> +of time as well. >> >> For those unable to make their contributions as straightforward gifts, >> the OpenBSD Foundation (http://OpenBSDFoundation.org) is a Canadian >> >> >> Or perhaps it should be expend instead. Not sure, but both sound weird. > both suggested fixes would be fine. No it would not. The first sentence is no longer true, see http://www.openbsdfoundation.org/contributors.html So this would need a much larger fix. > however i have no idea which README this is... Indeed, i see no evidence that this old text still exists anywhere. At least locate README | xargs grep -F 'No major funding' turns up nothing for me. Yours, Ingo
Re: README patch
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:14:24PM -0600, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > EADME.orig 2017-11-08 20:11:47.091955000 -0600 > +++ README 2017-11-08 20:12:19.787639000 -0600 > @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ > > No major funding or cost-sharing of the project comes from any company > or educational institution. Theo works full-time on improving OpenBSD > -and paying bills, many other developers expend spend significant > -quantities of time as well. > +and paying bills, many other developers spend significant quantities > +of time as well. > > For those unable to make their contributions as straightforward gifts, > the OpenBSD Foundation (http://OpenBSDFoundation.org) is a Canadian > > > Or perhaps it should be expend instead. Not sure, but both sound weird. > both suggested fixes would be fine. however i have no idea which README this is... jmc
README patch
EADME.orig 2017-11-08 20:11:47.091955000 -0600 +++ README 2017-11-08 20:12:19.787639000 -0600 @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ No major funding or cost-sharing of the project comes from any company or educational institution. Theo works full-time on improving OpenBSD -and paying bills, many other developers expend spend significant -quantities of time as well. +and paying bills, many other developers spend significant quantities +of time as well. For those unable to make their contributions as straightforward gifts, the OpenBSD Foundation (http://OpenBSDFoundation.org) is a Canadian Or perhaps it should be expend instead. Not sure, but both sound weird.
