On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:48:42 +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
Good evening everyone,
I discovered about one or two weeks ago that I can't link any debug
libraries on OpenBSD. At first I thought it was a cmake update[1] but
then I started digging further and it turns out its our gcc.
This is not
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 09:15:38PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:48:42 +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
Good evening everyone,
I discovered about one or two weeks ago that I can't link any debug
libraries on OpenBSD. At first I thought it was a cmake update[1] but
then I
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:54:20 +0200
From: Paul Irofti p...@irofti.net
I don't understand how, can you go into more details please?
Anyway, can we then just ignore the -pg option if it doesn't work for
shared instead of breaking the link? Or do you have a better solution?
Perhaps ld
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:54:20 +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 09:15:38PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:48:42 +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
Good evening everyone,
I discovered about one or two weeks ago that I can't link any debug
libraries on
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:05:05 +0100 (CET), Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:54:20 +0200
From: Paul Irofti p...@irofti.net
I don't understand how, can you go into more details please?
Anyway, can we then just ignore the -pg option if it doesn't work for
shared instead of
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Pascal Stumpf pascal.stu...@cubes.de wrote:
...
Anyway, can we then just ignore the -pg option if it doesn't work for
shared instead of breaking the link? Or do you have a better solution?
I could do that (if I figure out the correct gcc specs), sure.
Change
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:39:54 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Pascal Stumpf pascal.stu...@cubes.de wrote:
...
Anyway, can we then just ignore the -pg option if it doesn't work for
shared instead of breaking the link? Or do you have a better solution?
I could
