On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:11:37AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:45:10 +0100
> > From: Otto Moerbeek
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:59:41PM +0100, Franco Fichtner wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > found this still lingering in my tree. Still trying to figure
> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:45:10 +0100
> From: Otto Moerbeek
>
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:59:41PM +0100, Franco Fichtner wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > found this still lingering in my tree. Still trying to figure out
> > the best workflow for sending patches. Not sure if this adheres
> > to t
On Feb 17, 2013, at 6:45 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:59:41PM +0100, Franco Fichtner wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> found this still lingering in my tree. Still trying to figure out
>> the best workflow for sending patches. Not sure if this adheres
>> to the standards.
>>
>
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:59:41PM +0100, Franco Fichtner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> found this still lingering in my tree. Still trying to figure out
> the best workflow for sending patches. Not sure if this adheres
> to the standards.
>
> Thanks,
> Franco
> ---
> share/man/man3/tree.3 | 2 +-
> 1 f
