On 2012/03/06 10:20, Gabriel Linder wrote:
> On 03/05/12 21:10, Erik Lax wrote:
> >On 3/2/12 5:09 PM, Gabriel Linder wrote:
> >>Since 5.0 rules injected by relayd includes "on rdomain 0" and
> >>"prio 0", I guess that's not intended ?
> >I think you're right. And if so, the same problem seem to exi
just to confirm, I've seen this, this is a problem and we're
discussing how to fix the offenders (it's not just relayd)
* Gabriel Linder [2012-03-02 18:26]:
> Since 5.0 rules injected by relayd includes "on rdomain 0" and "prio
> 0", I guess that's not intended ?
>
> Index: pfe_filter.c
> ==
On 03/05/12 21:10, Erik Lax wrote:
On 3/2/12 5:09 PM, Gabriel Linder wrote:
Since 5.0 rules injected by relayd includes "on rdomain 0" and "prio
0", I guess that's not intended ?
I think you're right. And if so, the same problem seem to exist for
the ftp-proxy (filter.c) as well. I guess this i
On 3/2/12 5:09 PM, Gabriel Linder wrote:
Since 5.0 rules injected by relayd includes "on rdomain 0" and "prio
0", I guess that's not intended ?
I think you're right. And if so, the same problem seem to exist for the
ftp-proxy (filter.c) as well. I guess this is what happens when default
values
