On 2016-12-20, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> i'm not sure why "while :" is better in this example, but "while true"
> is clearer, i think. allowing for differences in preference, is their a
> good reason to change what's there?
I agree that "true" is clearer and I see no reason to change this.
--
Ch
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 09:59:18AM +0100, Michal Mazurek wrote:
> On 22:49:38, 20.12.16, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:58:40PM +0100, Michal Mazurek wrote:
> > > While there is nothing wrong with "while true", "while :" is better
> > > and used a lot more often in the source
On 22:49:38, 20.12.16, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:58:40PM +0100, Michal Mazurek wrote:
> > While there is nothing wrong with "while true", "while :" is better
> > and used a lot more often in the source tree.
> >
> > OK?
> >
>
> i'm not sure why "while :" is better in thi
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:58:40PM +0100, Michal Mazurek wrote:
> > While there is nothing wrong with "while true", "while :" is better
> > and used a lot more often in the source tree.
> >
> > OK?
> >
>
> i'm not sure why "while :" is bett
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:58:40PM +0100, Michal Mazurek wrote:
> While there is nothing wrong with "while true", "while :" is better
> and used a lot more often in the source tree.
>
> OK?
>
i'm not sure why "while :" is better in this example, but "while true"
is clearer, i think. allowing for