On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:39:30 +0100
Antoine Jacoutot :
> Index: syspatch.8
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/syspatch/syspatch.8,v
> retrieving revision 1.21
> diff -u -p -r1.21 syspatch.8
> --- syspatch.825 Jul 2020
Hi Antoine,
Antoine Jacoutot wrote on Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 01:39:30PM +0100:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 01:30:55PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> Antoine Jacoutot wrote on Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 01:01:27PM +0100:
>>> I just tested this change and it seems to work:
[...]
>> I think a slightly more
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 01:30:55PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hello Antoine,
>
> Antoine Jacoutot wrote on Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 01:01:27PM +0100:
>
> > I just tested this change and it seems to work:
>
> I did not repeat my testing, but here is some quick feedback purely
> from code
Hello Antoine,
Antoine Jacoutot wrote on Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 01:01:27PM +0100:
> I just tested this change and it seems to work:
I did not repeat my testing, but here is some quick feedback purely
from code inspection:
The proposed code change makes sense to me.
The proposed manual page text
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 11:54:04AM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > Index: syspatch.sh
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/syspatch/syspatch.sh,v
> > retrieving revision 1.166
> > diff -u -p -r1.166 syspatch.sh
> > --- syspatch.sh
Hi Antoine,
Antoine Jacoutot wrote on Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 09:48:36AM +0100:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 10:52:37PM +0100, Alexander Hall wrote:
>> On December 6, 2020 8:13:26 PM GMT+01:00, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 05:20:31PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On
On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 10:52:37PM +0100, Alexander Hall wrote:
>
>
> On December 6, 2020 8:13:26 PM GMT+01:00, Antoine Jacoutot
> wrote:
> >On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 05:20:31PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> On 2020/12/06 16:39, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at
>
> Returning a non-zero exit status is generally a sign of some sort of
> failure. Not applying a patch due to already having the patch applied
> is not really a failure.
>
The joys of running Solaris 2.x patches in the late 90s, where "ERROR 02"
means
the above, you already have the patch. And
On December 6, 2020 8:13:26 PM GMT+01:00, Antoine Jacoutot
wrote:
>On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 05:20:31PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2020/12/06 16:39, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>> > On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 03:31:19PM +, SW wrote:
>> >
>> > > On 06/12/2020 14:32, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>>
On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 05:20:31PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020/12/06 16:39, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 03:31:19PM +, SW wrote:
> >
> > > On 06/12/2020 14:32, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 02:19:05PM +, SW wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>
On 2020/12/06 16:39, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 03:31:19PM +, SW wrote:
>
> > On 06/12/2020 14:32, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 02:19:05PM +, SW wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >> I've been looking to have syspatch give me a quick indication of
> Returning a non-zero exit status is generally a sign of some sort of
> failure. Not applying a patch due to already having the patch applied
> is not really a failure.
Generally agreed, though at the same time, sysupgrade returns non-zero
if there is no upgrade to apply so the same behaviour
On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 02:19:05PM +, SW wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been looking to have syspatch give me a quick indication of whether
> a reboot is likely to be required. As a quick and dirty check, I've just
> been treating "Were patches applied?" as the indicator.
>
> The following diff will
On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 03:31:19PM +, SW wrote:
> On 06/12/2020 14:32, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 02:19:05PM +, SW wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> I've been looking to have syspatch give me a quick indication of whether
> >> a reboot is likely to be required. As a quick and
On 06/12/2020 14:32, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 02:19:05PM +, SW wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I've been looking to have syspatch give me a quick indication of whether
>> a reboot is likely to be required. As a quick and dirty check, I've just
>> been treating "Were patches applied?"
On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 02:19:05PM +, SW wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been looking to have syspatch give me a quick indication of whether
> a reboot is likely to be required. As a quick and dirty check, I've just
> been treating "Were patches applied?" as the indicator.
>
> The following diff will
16 matches
Mail list logo
