Am 22.04.2014 17:28 schrieb Mike Belopuhov:
more like it's not supported and is not supposed to work.
not supposed as in 'not wanted'?
it's like running nginx and apache at the same time but
Quite frankly: I'm doing that in some locations ;-)
worse since there are kernel tentacles involved
On 24 April 2014 12:12, Philipp
e1c1bac6253dc54a1e89ddc046585...@posteo.net wrote:
Am 22.04.2014 17:28 schrieb Mike Belopuhov:
more like it's not supported and is not supposed to work.
not supposed as in 'not wanted'?
not supposed.
it's like running nginx and apache at the same time but
Mike Belopuhov [m...@belopuhov.com] wrote:
more like it's not supported and is not supposed to work.
it's like running nginx and apache at the same time
hey, nginx and httpd run concurrently quite fine on
different IP addresses, same box :)
On 24 April 2014 20:25, Chris Cappuccio ch...@nmedia.net wrote:
Mike Belopuhov [m...@belopuhov.com] wrote:
more like it's not supported and is not supposed to work.
it's like running nginx and apache at the same time
hey, nginx and httpd run concurrently quite fine on
different IP
On 2014/04/24 20:30, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On 24 April 2014 20:25, Chris Cappuccio ch...@nmedia.net wrote:
Mike Belopuhov [m...@belopuhov.com] wrote:
more like it's not supported and is not supposed to work.
it's like running nginx and apache at the same time
hey, nginx and httpd run
On 04/24/14 21:53, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/04/24 20:30, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On 24 April 2014 20:25, Chris Cappuccio ch...@nmedia.net wrote:
Mike Belopuhov [m...@belopuhov.com] wrote:
more like it's not supported and is not supposed to work.
it's like running nginx and apache at the
On 24 April 2014 22:25, Alexander Hall alexan...@beard.se wrote:
On 04/24/14 21:53, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/04/24 20:30, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On 24 April 2014 20:25, Chris Cappuccio ch...@nmedia.net wrote:
Mike Belopuhov [m...@belopuhov.com] wrote:
more like it's not supported
On 2014/04/24 22:28, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On 24 April 2014 22:25, Alexander Hall alexan...@beard.se wrote:
On 04/24/14 21:53, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/04/24 20:30, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On 24 April 2014 20:25, Chris Cappuccio ch...@nmedia.net wrote:
Mike Belopuhov
On 22 April 2014 17:13, Philipp
e1c1bac6253dc54a1e89ddc046585...@posteo.net wrote:
It happened! A remote peer *requires* IKEv2 - and I've to do that on a
machine running isakmpd with somewhat 25+ IKEv1 peers.
First hurdle: I cannot bind iked to a certain (carp) IP-address. Mad
workaround:
