On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 07:07:13PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 04:58:23 +0200
> > From: Artturi Alm
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > i'm likely responsible, for having sent the diff that introduced this.
> > minimal fix taken w/diff -U10, to show the obvious dup++.
> >
> > -Arttur
> Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 04:58:23 +0200
> From: Artturi Alm
>
> Hi,
>
> i'm likely responsible, for having sent the diff that introduced this.
> minimal fix taken w/diff -U10, to show the obvious dup++.
>
> -Artturi
I think it makes more sense to fix it this way:
ok?
Index: arch/armv7/sunxi
Hi,
i'm likely responsible, for having sent the diff that introduced this.
minimal fix taken w/diff -U10, to show the obvious dup++.
-Artturi
diff --git a/sys/arch/armv7/sunxi/sxie.c b/sys/arch/armv7/sunxi/sxie.c
index 1cd713cd52a..cb5849c7dc9 100644
--- a/sys/arch/armv7/sunxi/sxie.c
+++ b/sys/