Re: armv7 small XXX fix

2017-07-13 Thread Artturi Alm
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 04:21:11PM -0400, Dale Rahn wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:06:23PM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 06:12:34PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 23:18:59 +0300 > > > > From: Artturi Alm > > > > > >

Re: armv7 small XXX fix

2017-07-12 Thread Dale Rahn
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:06:23PM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 06:12:34PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 23:18:59 +0300 > > > From: Artturi Alm > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > this does clutter my diffs, and the XXX comment is

Re: armv7 small XXX fix

2017-07-12 Thread Artturi Alm
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 06:12:34PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 23:18:59 +0300 > > From: Artturi Alm > > > > Hi, > > > > this does clutter my diffs, and the XXX comment is correct, > > It probably isn't. None of the other architectures have

Re: armv7 small XXX fix

2017-07-12 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 23:18:59 +0300 > From: Artturi Alm > > Hi, > > this does clutter my diffs, and the XXX comment is correct, It probably isn't. None of the other architectures have those macros in their . > currently used _C_LABEL() is nothing, and i find it's

armv7 small XXX fix

2017-07-10 Thread Artturi Alm
Hi, this does clutter my diffs, and the XXX comment is correct, currently used _C_LABEL() is nothing, and i find it's usage directly rather pointless/weird, this does atleast make x .globl, so there is benefit to the added characters in written code be it _C_LABEL() or C_OBJECT() instead of just