Re: disable altq functions

2011-07-01 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 03:00:09PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
 On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Ted Unangst wrote:
 
  Does anybody use altq cdnr or rio?  Do they work?  Why do we have them, 
  but not enabled?
 
 So it seems like cdnr and rio are dead.  Last chance, would anyone like to 
 object before I start my chainsaw?

I would prefer if someone would actually do real work on altq and not
just chainsawing the mostly dead branches of the tree. Wishful think I
know. Did you check the other BSD if they finished these two modes?

-- 
:wq Claudio



Re: disable altq functions

2011-07-01 Thread Henning Brauer
* Claudio Jeker clau...@openbsd.org [2011-07-02 00:11]:
 On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 03:00:09PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
  On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Ted Unangst wrote:
  
   Does anybody use altq cdnr or rio?  Do they work?  Why do we have them, 
   but not enabled?
  
  So it seems like cdnr and rio are dead.  Last chance, would anyone like to 
  object before I start my chainsaw?
 
 I would prefer if someone would actually do real work on altq and not
 just chainsawing the mostly dead branches of the tree. Wishful think I
 know. Did you check the other BSD if they finished these two modes?

what i have in mind in that ara only involved prio and hfsc (the
latter just because ppl will want it :(( ) - I think cdnr and rio
belong to the attic, so kill kill kill. if anyone wants to revive them
they're still available in Attic.

-- 
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting



disable altq functions

2011-06-22 Thread Ted Unangst
Does anybody use altq cdnr or rio?  Do they work?  Why do we have them, 
but not enabled?

The last function commit to cdnr was over 8 years ago, and says it's still 
not ready for pf.  So that seems really dead.  rio may work, but what good 
are disabled options?

RIO is documented in options(4), CDNR is not.  options also documents the 
old ALTQ_NOPCC option which doesn't exist.  I intend to delete that, but 
should I delete RIO as well?

Index: files
===
RCS file: /home/tedu/cvs/src/sys/conf/files,v
retrieving revision 1.512
diff -u -r1.512 files
--- files   7 Apr 2011 13:42:53 -   1.512
+++ files   22 Jun 2011 17:21:09 -
@@ -558,10 +558,8 @@
 file altq/altq_red.c   altq
 file altq/altq_cbq.c   altq
 file altq/altq_rmclass.c   altq
-file altq/altq_cdnr.c  altq_cdnr
 file altq/altq_hfsc.c  altq
 file altq/altq_priq.c  altq
-file altq/altq_rio.c   altq_rio
 file ddb/db_access.c   ddb | kgdb
 file ddb/db_aout.c ddb
 file ddb/db_break.cddb