On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 06:47:14PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> certainly ok by me. i think this commit could add aggr to the list of
> devices in "create".
Right, thanks.
> bridge is a bit different i think. i wouldn;t like to have those
> synopses dropped because i think they're useful. but
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 07:33:55PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Except for `trunkproto' wich his trunk(4) specific, aggr(4) has the same
> options so I'd like to merge it into the same section just like TUNNEL
> documents mostly identical interfaces with differences mentioned in at
> specific
Except for `trunkproto' wich his trunk(4) specific, aggr(4) has the same
options so I'd like to merge it into the same section just like TUNNEL
documents mostly identical interfaces with differences mentioned in at
specific options.
The wording "trunk" seems clear under OpenBSD, but other vendors
