On 12.1.2017. 18:27, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 12.1.2017. 16:20, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> On 10/01/17(Tue) 10:37, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>>> In pfkey_sendup() we call sorwakeup() which asserts for NET_LOCK(), so
>>> we are already at IPL_SOFTNET.
>>>
>>> pfkeyv2_send() is called via
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:37:38AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> In pfkey_sendup() we call sorwakeup() which asserts for NET_LOCK(), so
> we are already at IPL_SOFTNET.
>
> pfkeyv2_send() is called via pfkey_output() which is also called with
> the NET_LOCK() held.
>
> Finally replace a
On 12.1.2017. 16:20, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 10/01/17(Tue) 10:37, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> In pfkey_sendup() we call sorwakeup() which asserts for NET_LOCK(), so
>> we are already at IPL_SOFTNET.
>>
>> pfkeyv2_send() is called via pfkey_output() which is also called with
>> the NET_LOCK()
On 10/01/17(Tue) 10:37, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> In pfkey_sendup() we call sorwakeup() which asserts for NET_LOCK(), so
> we are already at IPL_SOFTNET.
>
> pfkeyv2_send() is called via pfkey_output() which is also called with
> the NET_LOCK() held.
>
> Finally replace a comment above
In pfkey_sendup() we call sorwakeup() which asserts for NET_LOCK(), so
we are already at IPL_SOFTNET.
pfkeyv2_send() is called via pfkey_output() which is also called with
the NET_LOCK() held.
Finally replace a comment above pfkeyv2_ipo_walk() by the corresponding
assert.
ok?
Index: