Re: remove ntfs write code

2016-09-01 Thread Theo de Raadt
Removing unfinished write support makes sense. Who knows, maybe it makes read support more sustainable...

Re: remove ntfs write code

2016-09-01 Thread Ted Unangst
Martin Natano wrote: > mount_ntfs forces the mount point to be MNT_RDONLY, so the write parts > in ntfs are never used. OK to remove? i think so. by the way, this code is probably a dead end, compared to the fuse code. is that right? but we should keep it around for a while until we're sure the

Re: remove ntfs write code

2016-09-01 Thread Martin Natano
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 05:17:41PM -0600, Bob Beck wrote: > Yes, ok beck@ > > to be shortly followed by the ntfs code - don't we have a fuse version of > this? There's the ntfs_3g port benno uses. Iirc, access via ntfs_3g is somewhat slower than with the native filesystem (not that I care). >

Re: remove ntfs write code

2016-08-31 Thread Bob Beck
Yes, ok beck@ to be shortly followed by the ntfs code - don't we have a fuse version of this? On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Martin Natano wrote: > mount_ntfs forces the mount point to be MNT_RDONLY, so the write parts > in ntfs are never used. OK to remove? > > natano >

Re: remove ntfs write code

2016-08-31 Thread Sebastian Benoit
as far as i'm concerned ok benno@ btw i have incresingly problems with mounting ntfs partions (read-only) with this and use the ntfs_3g fuse port. Martin Natano(nat...@natano.net) on 2016.08.31 23:34:43 +0200: > mount_ntfs forces the mount point to be MNT_RDONLY, so the write parts > in ntfs are

remove ntfs write code

2016-08-31 Thread Martin Natano
mount_ntfs forces the mount point to be MNT_RDONLY, so the write parts in ntfs are never used. OK to remove? natano Index: ntfs/ntfs_subr.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/ntfs/ntfs_subr.c,v retrieving revision 1.47 diff -u -p -r1.47