Let me updated the diff.
On Mon, 06 Jul 2020 17:54:30 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 02:42:02 +0200
> Klemens Nanni wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:00:30AM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>>> inet_makenetandmask() had required another treatment.
>>>
>>> Also -pref
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 02:42:02 +0200
Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:00:30AM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> inet_makenetandmask() had required another treatment.
>>
>> Also -prefixlen 0 for -inet has a bug
>>
>> % doas ./obj/route -T100 add -inet 0.0.0.0 -prefixlen 0 127.0.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:00:30AM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> inet_makenetandmask() had required another treatment.
>
> Also -prefixlen 0 for -inet has a bug
>
> % doas ./obj/route -T100 add -inet 0.0.0.0 -prefixlen 0 127.0.0.1
> add net 0.0.0.0: gateway 127.0.0.1
> % netstat -nrf inet -
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:18:17 +0200
Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:55:10PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> The function mask_addr() doesn't mask address for IPv4 and IPv6. Does
>> any address family other than IPv4 or IPv6 require #1142:1148? The
>> function seems to just tri
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:55:10PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> The function mask_addr() doesn't mask address for IPv4 and IPv6. Does
> any address family other than IPv4 or IPv6 require #1142:1148? The
> function seems to just trim the trailing zero. Is it neccesaary? And
> it causes the c
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 18:45:07 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:12:23 +0200
> Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> On 28/06/20(Sun) 20:41, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> When "::/0" is used as "default",
>>
Hi,
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:12:23 +0200
Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 28/06/20(Sun) 20:41, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When "::/0" is used as "default",
>>
>> # route add ::/0 fe80::1%em0
>> add net ::/0: gateway fe80::1%em
On 28/06/20(Sun) 20:41, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When "::/0" is used as "default",
>
> # route add ::/0 fe80::1%em0
> add net ::/0: gateway fe80::1%em0: Invalid argument
>
> route command trims the sockaddr to { .len = 2, .family =
Hi,
When "::/0" is used as "default",
# route add ::/0 fe80::1%em0
add net ::/0: gateway fe80::1%em0: Invalid argument
route command trims the sockaddr to { .len = 2, .family = AF_INET6 }
for "::/0", but rtable_satoplen() refuses it. I think it should be
acce
