> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:56:43 +0100
> From: Martin Pieuchot
>
> On 22/12/16(Thu) 10:45, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 22/12/16(Thu) 00:32, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > splassert: ip_output: want 1 have 0
> > > Starting stack trace...
> > > ip_outpu
> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:56:43 +0100
> From: Martin Pieuchot
>
> On 22/12/16(Thu) 10:45, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 22/12/16(Thu) 00:32, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > splassert: ip_output: want 1 have 0
> > > Starting stack trace...
> > > ip_outpu
On 22/12/16(Thu) 10:45, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 22/12/16(Thu) 00:32, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > splassert: ip_output: want 1 have 0
> > Starting stack trace...
> > ip_output() at ip_output+0x7d
> > ipsp_process_done() at ipsp_process_done+0x2ad
> > esp_o
On 22/12/16(Thu) 00:32, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> splassert: ip_output: want 1 have 0
> Starting stack trace...
> ip_output() at ip_output+0x7d
> ipsp_process_done() at ipsp_process_done+0x2ad
> esp_output_cb() at esp_output_cb+0x135
> taskq_thread() at taskq_thread+0x6c
> end tr
splassert: ip_output: want 1 have 0
Starting stack trace...
ip_output() at ip_output+0x7d
ipsp_process_done() at ipsp_process_done+0x2ad
esp_output_cb() at esp_output_cb+0x135
taskq_thread() at taskq_thread+0x6c
end trace frame: 0x0, count: 253
End of stack trace.
This makes no sense to me since
