Hi Ted,
Ted Unangst wrote on Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:51:34AM -0500:
> Neither strftime nor strptime describe the fields inside struct tm,
> and while they eventually point that way in references, strftime
> provides no guidance as to which of its nine (9!) references
> I should read next. I don't like guessing.
Feel free to drop the pair of parentheses in the strptime.3
case if you want to, they don't seem to be needed, like so:
+.Fa tm
+described in
+.Xr mktime 3 .
Either way, OK schwarze@.
Ingo
> Index: strftime.3
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/time/strftime.3,v
> retrieving revision 1.34
> diff -u -p -r1.34 strftime.3
> --- strftime.329 Jan 2015 01:46:31 - 1.34
> +++ strftime.330 Dec 2015 16:46:29 -
> @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ The
> .Fn strftime
> function formats the information from
> .Fa timeptr
> +(as described in
> +.Xr mktime 3 )
> into the buffer
> .Fa buf
> according to the string pointed to by
> Index: strptime.3
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/time/strptime.3,v
> retrieving revision 1.24
> diff -u -p -r1.24 strptime.3
> --- strptime.34 Dec 2014 00:10:40 - 1.24
> +++ strptime.330 Dec 2015 16:47:17 -
> @@ -44,7 +44,9 @@ function parses the string
> according to the specified
> .Fa format
> and fills matching data into the structure
> -.Fa tm .
> +.Fa tm
> +(described in
> +.Xr mktime 3 ) .
> .Pp
> The
> .Fa format
>
