Donovan Watteau wrote:
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > I disagree with this.
> >
> > Because next you'll be asking for the ls manpage to list "rm" and "touch"...
>
> That's not my personal intent no, but I get your point.
>
> concatenating/splitting are exact complementary actions, so I thought
> t
Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I disagree with this.
>
> Because next you'll be asking for the ls manpage to list "rm" and "touch"...
That's not my personal intent no, but I get your point.
concatenating/splitting are exact complementary actions, so I thought
this section would accept cross-references i
I disagree with this.
Because next you'll be asking for the ls manpage to list "rm" and "touch"...
Donovan Watteau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ten years ago, a teacher of mine asked why "the command which
> concatenates files never mentions the command which splits files".
>
> Ten years later, I still t
Hi,
Ten years ago, a teacher of mine asked why "the command which
concatenates files never mentions the command which splits files".
Ten years later, I still think he made a good point, so here's a diff.
If there's a reason for things to be the way they are, I'm still
curious to learn it :)
Dono
